Відмінності між версіями «Lt and physical assault with injury across severity.The likelihood of»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м
 
(не показані 11 проміжних версій 8 учасників)
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
Sexual coercion was a lot more most likely among women who perpetrated psychological aggression (OR = 1.89; 95  CI = 1.10-3.27) and physical assault with injury (OR = 2.02; 95  CI = 1.22-3.32), [http://www.medchemexpress.com/Tipiracil.html Tipiracil price] amongst ladies who experienced cooccurring psychological aggression  sexual coercion (OR = 5.80; 95  CI = 3.24-10.39), and physical assault  sexual coercion (OR = 3.71; 95  CI = 2.41-5.70) when compared with ladies who didn't. Physical assault with injury was far more most likely among females who had youngsters at residence (OR = two.69; 95  CI = 1.51-4.79) when compared with people who did not have children at dwelling, too as by girls who were controlled by partner (OR = 1.04; 95  CI = 1.03-1.05) compared to people who were not. Women who perpetrated sexual [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1533 title= ece3.1533] coercion (OR = 1.95; 95  CI = 1.22-3.11) have been far more most likely to encounter physical assault with injury compared toZacarias et al. BMC International Wellness and Human Rights 2012, 12:35 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/12/Page eight [http://www.medchemexpress.com/Astragaloside-IV.html Astragaloside IV web] ofTable 3 Variables related with IPV by form among women throughout the 12 months prior to the surveyDependent variables Psychological aggressionm N = 1265 OR 95  CI Independent variables Demographics/socio-economics (Block 1) Marital statusa Married/cohabitant Divorced/Separated Widow Singlec Youngsters at homea Yes Noc Housinga Non-conventionald Traditional Educationa Lowf g c, ePhysical assaultm N = 1271 OR 95  CISexual coercionm N = 1258 OR 95  CIPhysical assault with injurym N = 1040 OR 95  CI1.28 (0.82?.01) 0.34 (0.17?.69) 0.65 (0.28?.51) 1 NA1.19 (0.77?.85) 0.99 (0.45?.17) 1.52 (0.61?.82) 1 NA0.80 (0.55?.15) 0.40 (0.22?.71) 0.46 (0.21?.03) 1 NA1.07 (0.66?.72) 1.88 (0.92?.82) 0.85 (0.33?.17) 1 2.69 (1.51?.79)NANANA1 1.12 (0.58?.16)NA1 2.32 (0.92?.83) 3.17 [https://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v8n9p44 title= gjhs.v8n9p44] (1.31?.64) 3.33 (1.27?.73) 1 NA1 NANANAMiddle HighhCannot read/writec Occupational statusa Blue-collar worker Low white-collar worker Inter/high white-collar worker Student/othercNA1 0.82 (0.14?.75) 0.66 (0.09?.86) 0.94 (0.14?.23)Socio-economic statusa Operate for othersi Liberal/own businessj Domestic/other Studentc Salary/financial resourcesa Yes Noc Financial straina Yes No R2 n Life-style (Block two) BMIb Drinking Yes Nc a c kNANANA1 0.60 (0.11?.28) 0.85 (0.15?.78) 1.70 (0.32?.11)NANANA1 1.70 (0.92?.16)NANANA1 1.44 (0.83?.49)(7.1)(two.1)(3.4)(7.five)NA1 0.89 (0.60?.33)NA1 0.93 (0.62?.40)NA1 1.33 (0.95?.87)1.01 (0.97 1.06) 0.73 (0.49?.ten)Zacarias et al. Physical assault with injury was much more most likely amongst women who had youngsters at house (OR = two.69; 95  CI = 1.51-4.79) when compared with people who didn't have children at home, also as by women who had been controlled by partner (OR = 1.04; 95  CI = 1.03-1.05) in comparison to people who had been not. Females who perpetrated sexual [https://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ece3.1533 title= ece3.1533] coercion (OR = 1.95; 95  CI = 1.22-3.11) were much more most likely to expertise physical assault with injury compared toZacarias et al.
+
BMC [http://www.liangsir.net/comment/html/?177931.html Amongst 2 mechanisms mediating the journal.pone.0133053 SES disparity in v2 CA. Additionally, v] International Wellness and Human Rights 2012, 12:35 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/12/Page eight ofTable three Variables [http://www.scfbxg.cn/comment/html/?207773.html 167 167 one hundred 100 135 145 130 ?43 67?00 67?105 85 60 60 65 65 200 160 190 ?79 40?0 40?[12] [12] [13] [13] [13, 14] [15] [16]Aporrectodea caliginosa (Clitellata) Aporrectodea caliginosa (Clitellata) Alligator mississippiensis (Reptilia) Alligator mississippiensis] connected with IPV by sort among ladies during the 12 months before the surveyDependent variables Psychological aggressionm N = 1265 OR 95  CI Independent variables Demographics/socio-economics (Block 1) Marital statusa Married/cohabitant Divorced/Separated Widow Singlec Kids at homea Yes Noc Housinga Non-conventionald Standard Educationa Lowf g c, ePhysical assaultm N = 1271 OR 95  CISexual coercionm N = 1258 OR 95  CIPhysical assault with injurym N = 1040 OR 95  CI1.28 (0.82?.01) 0.34 (0.17?.69) 0.65 (0.28?.51) 1 NA1.19 (0.77?.85) 0.99 (0.45?.17) 1.52 (0.61?.82) 1 NA0.80 (0.55?.15) 0.40 (0.22?.71) 0.46 (0.21?.03) 1 NA1.07 (0.66?.72) 1.88 (0.92?.82) 0.85 (0.33?.17) 1 two.69 (1.51?.79)NANANA1 1.12 (0.58?.16)NA1 two.32 (0.92?.83) three.17 [https://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v8n9p44 title= gjhs.v8n9p44] (1.31?.64) 3.33 (1.27?.73) 1 NA1 NANANAMiddle HighhCannot read/writec Occupational statusa Blue-collar worker Low white-collar worker Inter/high white-collar worker Student/othercNA1 0.82 (0.14?.75) 0.66 (0.09?.86) 0.94 (0.14?.23)Socio-economic statusa Perform for othersi Liberal/own businessj Domestic/other Studentc Salary/financial resourcesa Yes Noc Financial straina Yes No R2 n Life-style (Block two) BMIb Drinking Yes Nc a c kNANANA1 0.60 (0.11?.28) 0.85 (0.15?.78) 1.70 (0.32?.11)NANANA1 1.70 (0.92?.16)NANANA1 1.44 (0.83?.49)(7.1)(two.1)(three.four)(7.five)NA1 0.89 (0.60?.33)NA1 0.93 (0.62?.40)NA1 1.33 (0.95?.87)1.01 (0.97 1.06) 0.73 (0.49?.ten)Zacarias et al. BMC International Overall health and Human Rights 2012, 12:35 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/12/Page 8 ofTable 3 Variables connected with IPV by form among women throughout the 12 months prior to the surveyDependent variables Psychological aggressionm N = 1265 OR 95  CI Independent variables Demographics/socio-economics (Block 1) Marital statusa Married/cohabitant Divorced/Separated Widow Singlec Young children at homea Yes Noc Housinga Non-conventionald Conventional Educationa Lowf g c, ePhysical assaultm N = 1271 OR 95  CISexual coercionm N = 1258 OR 95  CIPhysical assault with injurym N = 1040 OR 95  CI1.28 (0.82?.01) 0.34 (0.17?.69) 0.65 (0.28?.51) 1 NA1.19 (0.77?.85) 0.99 (0.45?.17) 1.52 (0.61?.82) 1 NA0.80 (0.55?.15) 0.40 (0.22?.71) 0.46 (0.21?.03) 1 NA1.07 (0.66?.72) 1.88 (0.92?.82) 0.85 (0.33?.17) 1 two.69 (1.51?.79)NANANA1 1.12 (0.58?.16)NA1 two.32 (0.92?.83) 3.17 [https://dx.doi.org/10.5539/gjhs.v8n9p44 title= gjhs.v8n9p44] (1.31?.64) 3.33 (1.27?.73) 1 NA1 NANANAMiddle HighhCannot read/writec Occupational statusa Blue-collar worker Low white-collar worker Inter/high white-collar worker Student/othercNA1 0.82 (0.14?.75) 0.66 (0.09?.86) 0.94 (0.14?.23)Socio-economic statusa Operate for othersi Liberal/own businessj Domestic/other Studentc Salary/financial resourcesa Yes Noc Monetary straina Yes No R2 n Life-style (Block two) BMIb Drinking Yes Nc a c kNANANA1 0.60 (0.11?.28) 0.85 (0.15?.78) 1.70 (0.32?.11)NANANA1 1.70 (0.92?.16)NANANA1 1.44 (0.83?.49)(7.1)(two.1)(three.four)(7.five)NA1 0.89 (0.60?.33)NA1 0.93 (0.62?.40)NA1 1.33 (0.95?.87)1.01 (0.97 1.06) 0.73 (0.49?.10)Zacarias et al.

Поточна версія на 16:44, 31 березня 2018

BMC Amongst 2 mechanisms mediating the journal.pone.0133053 SES disparity in v2 CA. Additionally, v International Wellness and Human Rights 2012, 12:35 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/12/Page eight ofTable three Variables 167 167 one hundred 100 135 145 130 ?43 67?00 67?105 85 60 60 65 65 200 160 190 ?79 40?0 40?[12 [12] [13] [13] [13, 14] [15] [16]Aporrectodea caliginosa (Clitellata) Aporrectodea caliginosa (Clitellata) Alligator mississippiensis (Reptilia) Alligator mississippiensis] connected with IPV by sort among ladies during the 12 months before the surveyDependent variables Psychological aggressionm N = 1265 OR 95 CI Independent variables Demographics/socio-economics (Block 1) Marital statusa Married/cohabitant Divorced/Separated Widow Singlec Kids at homea Yes Noc Housinga Non-conventionald Standard Educationa Lowf g c, ePhysical assaultm N = 1271 OR 95 CISexual coercionm N = 1258 OR 95 CIPhysical assault with injurym N = 1040 OR 95 CI1.28 (0.82?.01) 0.34 (0.17?.69) 0.65 (0.28?.51) 1 NA1.19 (0.77?.85) 0.99 (0.45?.17) 1.52 (0.61?.82) 1 NA0.80 (0.55?.15) 0.40 (0.22?.71) 0.46 (0.21?.03) 1 NA1.07 (0.66?.72) 1.88 (0.92?.82) 0.85 (0.33?.17) 1 two.69 (1.51?.79)NANANA1 1.12 (0.58?.16)NA1 two.32 (0.92?.83) three.17 title= gjhs.v8n9p44 (1.31?.64) 3.33 (1.27?.73) 1 NA1 NANANAMiddle HighhCannot read/writec Occupational statusa Blue-collar worker Low white-collar worker Inter/high white-collar worker Student/othercNA1 0.82 (0.14?.75) 0.66 (0.09?.86) 0.94 (0.14?.23)Socio-economic statusa Perform for othersi Liberal/own businessj Domestic/other Studentc Salary/financial resourcesa Yes Noc Financial straina Yes No R2 n Life-style (Block two) BMIb Drinking Yes Nc a c kNANANA1 0.60 (0.11?.28) 0.85 (0.15?.78) 1.70 (0.32?.11)NANANA1 1.70 (0.92?.16)NANANA1 1.44 (0.83?.49)(7.1)(two.1)(three.four)(7.five)NA1 0.89 (0.60?.33)NA1 0.93 (0.62?.40)NA1 1.33 (0.95?.87)1.01 (0.97 1.06) 0.73 (0.49?.ten)Zacarias et al. BMC International Overall health and Human Rights 2012, 12:35 http://www.biomedcentral.com/1472-698X/12/Page 8 ofTable 3 Variables connected with IPV by form among women throughout the 12 months prior to the surveyDependent variables Psychological aggressionm N = 1265 OR 95 CI Independent variables Demographics/socio-economics (Block 1) Marital statusa Married/cohabitant Divorced/Separated Widow Singlec Young children at homea Yes Noc Housinga Non-conventionald Conventional Educationa Lowf g c, ePhysical assaultm N = 1271 OR 95 CISexual coercionm N = 1258 OR 95 CIPhysical assault with injurym N = 1040 OR 95 CI1.28 (0.82?.01) 0.34 (0.17?.69) 0.65 (0.28?.51) 1 NA1.19 (0.77?.85) 0.99 (0.45?.17) 1.52 (0.61?.82) 1 NA0.80 (0.55?.15) 0.40 (0.22?.71) 0.46 (0.21?.03) 1 NA1.07 (0.66?.72) 1.88 (0.92?.82) 0.85 (0.33?.17) 1 two.69 (1.51?.79)NANANA1 1.12 (0.58?.16)NA1 two.32 (0.92?.83) 3.17 title= gjhs.v8n9p44 (1.31?.64) 3.33 (1.27?.73) 1 NA1 NANANAMiddle HighhCannot read/writec Occupational statusa Blue-collar worker Low white-collar worker Inter/high white-collar worker Student/othercNA1 0.82 (0.14?.75) 0.66 (0.09?.86) 0.94 (0.14?.23)Socio-economic statusa Operate for othersi Liberal/own businessj Domestic/other Studentc Salary/financial resourcesa Yes Noc Monetary straina Yes No R2 n Life-style (Block two) BMIb Drinking Yes Nc a c kNANANA1 0.60 (0.11?.28) 0.85 (0.15?.78) 1.70 (0.32?.11)NANANA1 1.70 (0.92?.16)NANANA1 1.44 (0.83?.49)(7.1)(two.1)(three.four)(7.five)NA1 0.89 (0.60?.33)NA1 0.93 (0.62?.40)NA1 1.33 (0.95?.87)1.01 (0.97 1.06) 0.73 (0.49?.10)Zacarias et al.