MLN0128 The Appropriate Method: Enables You To Feel Just Like A Rockstar

7 (28). The effect of imputed data substitutions (missing values) on internal consistency was undertaken in a sensitivity analysis. Both the EFA and CFA were performed using LISREL 8.80 (Scientific Software International, Inc., Lincolnwood, IL, USA), while other statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Window 21.0 program (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Results Of the 158 study subjects, 97 (61.4%) were male and ranged in age from 22 to 37 (median=24). Based on the six rotations of 2013 CCT examinations, the mean CARE measure score was 35.8 out of a possible 50. No floor or ceiling effects were observed. Descriptive, univariate statistics of key variables are shown in Table 1. Table 1 Descriptive statistics of key variables Exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis The validity of our data was Linsitinib price first confirmed using EFA where the Kaiser�CMeyer�COlkin measure of 0.94 and Bartlett��s test of sphericity [�� 2(45)=887.8, pCGK 733 one-factor model met the criteria demonstrating excellent goodness of fit (RMSEA=0.06; GFI=0.89; AGFI=0.83; CFI=0.99). The null hypothesis of chi-square test was rejected (�� 2=46.72; p=0.09), suggesting an adequate fit of the data with the one-factor model. EFA and CFA loading are shown in Table 2. Table 2 Exploratory and confirmatory factor loadings of CARE measure items Convergent and divergent validity Patients�� total CARE measure scores were strongly positively correlated with both their global empathy rating (��=0.79 and score (��=0.28 and check details In this study, we extrapolated its validity to include medical students�� consultations in an undergraduate family medicine setting �C showing that the CARE measure retained its original unidimensional structure (9), excellent internal consistency, and had good convergent and divergent validity. These findings bring the patient perspective squarely into medical educational assessment and should encourage more objective and standardized assessment of a complex attribute, empathy, in a formative (low-stake), family medicine context.