Відмінності між версіями «N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York, NY»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
−
Past [http://eaktalent.com/members/glue2walk/activity/99739/ Exposure of SKOV-3, OVCAR-3 or TOV-21G cells to various concentrations of PEITC for 24 h resulted within the significant inhibition from the phosphorylation as well as constitutive expression of AKT] investigation suggests that empathy could happen instantaneously and automatically when we recognize another's emotional state (Preston and De Waal, 2002), even when we're cognitively busy. Previous research has identified neural regions that are consistently activated for the duration of empathy for physical discomfort (i.e., dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dACC; and anterior insula, AI) (Morrison et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004; Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2005; Zaki et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009; Lamm et al., 2011). These dependable activations inside the dACC and AI have led some researchers to conclude that these regions are part of a core network in empathy (Fan et al., 2011). Cogn. Sci. Metzing, C., and Brennan, S. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: partner-specific effects around the comprehension of referring expressions. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 201?13. Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Proof of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest prior to trees: the precedence of worldwide attributes in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Small, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes in the brain.N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R. A., Bard, E. G. and Jeuniaux, P. (in press). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. Metzing, C., and Brennan, S. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 201?13. Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Proof of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychol. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving together: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 329?36. Richardson, D. C., and Dale, R. (2005). Seeking to realize:
+
Cogn. Sci. Metzing, C., and Brennan, S. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 201?13. Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: the precedence of worldwide options in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Small, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes inside the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving together: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 329?36. Richardson, D. C., and Dale, R. (2005). Planning to recognize:
−
Empathy enables us to know and share others' emotions, generating a bridge between the self and also the innermost experiences of an additional person. As we interact with other individuals in our every day lives, we may perhaps respond empathically to one particular particular person, but fail to connect with how one more individual is feeling. Even though previous study has suggested that specific factors--such as similarity for the target and familiarity with an experience--can trigger empathy (Preston and De Waal, 2002; Mitchell et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2009), pretty tiny research has examined how focus impacts our capability to empathize. Hence, the present study examines the role of automaticity and focus in neural processes underlying empathy.CORE NEURAL REGIONS FOR EMPATHYA essential explanation to look at empathy for multiple feelings beneath many different attentional conditions is that it enables for an analysisof core neural regions for empathy. Earlier research has identified neural regions which can be consistently activated throughout empathy for physical discomfort (i.e., dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dACC; and anterior insula, AI) (Morrison et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004; Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2005; Zaki et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009; Lamm et al., 2011). These reputable activations in the dACC and AI have led some researchers to conclude that these regions are part of a core network in empathy (Fan et al., 2011).
+
Empathy makes it possible for us to understand and share others' feelings, generating a bridge involving the self plus the innermost experiences of another particular person. Past study suggests that empathy may perhaps happen instantaneously and automatically when we recognize another's emotional state (Preston and De Waal, 2002), even though we are cognitively busy. On the other hand, other research suggests that empathy is disrupted when we're distracted and cognitively occupied (Gu and Han, 2007). Simply because attentional sources are usually depleted during daily interactions, it really is essential to understand if empathy is automatically engaged or calls for controlled and effortful processing. Thus, the current study examines the role of automaticity and interest in neural processes underlying empathy.CORE NEURAL REGIONS FOR EMPATHYA essential explanation to look at empathy for several emotions under various attentional situations is the fact that it allows for an analysisof core neural regions for empathy. Previous research has identified neural regions that are consistently activated through empathy for physical discomfort (i.e., dorsal [https://www.medchemexpress.com/ar-c155858.html 496791-37-8] anterior cingulate cortex, dACC; and anterior insula, AI) (Morrison et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004; Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2005; Zaki et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009; Lamm et al., 2011). These reliable activations within the dACC and AI have led some researchers to conclude that these regions are a part of a core network in empathy (Fan et al., 2011). Having said that, it's unknown whether the dACC and AI are essential to empathic processes extra typically (i.e., not only empathy for discomfort) and no matter whether these regions are activated during empathy for each good and negative feelings. Recent neuroimaging study suggests that other neural regions--such as the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC; BA 10), dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC; BA 9), and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC; BA 11)--may be involved in empathic processes.N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R. A., Bard, E. G. and Jeuniaux, P. (in press). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. Metzing, C., and Brennan, S. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: partner-specific effects around the comprehension of referring expressions. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 201?13. Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest ahead of trees: the precedence of [https://www.medchemexpress.com/RVX-208.html Apabetalone biological activity] international capabilities in visual perception.

Версія за 16:55, 16 серпня 2017

Cogn. Sci. Metzing, C., and Brennan, S. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: partner-specific effects on the comprehension of referring expressions. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 201?13. Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: the precedence of worldwide options in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Small, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes inside the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving together: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 329?36. Richardson, D. C., and Dale, R. (2005). Planning to recognize: Empathy makes it possible for us to understand and share others' feelings, generating a bridge involving the self plus the innermost experiences of another particular person. Past study suggests that empathy may perhaps happen instantaneously and automatically when we recognize another's emotional state (Preston and De Waal, 2002), even though we are cognitively busy. On the other hand, other research suggests that empathy is disrupted when we're distracted and cognitively occupied (Gu and Han, 2007). Simply because attentional sources are usually depleted during daily interactions, it really is essential to understand if empathy is automatically engaged or calls for controlled and effortful processing. Thus, the current study examines the role of automaticity and interest in neural processes underlying empathy.CORE NEURAL REGIONS FOR EMPATHYA essential explanation to look at empathy for several emotions under various attentional situations is the fact that it allows for an analysisof core neural regions for empathy. Previous research has identified neural regions that are consistently activated through empathy for physical discomfort (i.e., dorsal 496791-37-8 anterior cingulate cortex, dACC; and anterior insula, AI) (Morrison et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004; Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2005; Zaki et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009; Lamm et al., 2011). These reliable activations within the dACC and AI have led some researchers to conclude that these regions are a part of a core network in empathy (Fan et al., 2011). Having said that, it's unknown whether the dACC and AI are essential to empathic processes extra typically (i.e., not only empathy for discomfort) and no matter whether these regions are activated during empathy for each good and negative feelings. Recent neuroimaging study suggests that other neural regions--such as the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC; BA 10), dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC; BA 9), and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC; BA 11)--may be involved in empathic processes.N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R. A., Bard, E. G. and Jeuniaux, P. (in press). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. Metzing, C., and Brennan, S. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: partner-specific effects around the comprehension of referring expressions. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 201?13. Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest ahead of trees: the precedence of Apabetalone biological activity international capabilities in visual perception.

Отримано з http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=N_Psychophysiology._Lewin,_K._(1936)._Principles_of_Topological_Psychology._New_York,_NY&oldid=216029