Відмінності між версіями «N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York, NY»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
−
9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Compact, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes in the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving with each other: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 329?36. Richardson, D. C., and Dale, R. (2005). Wanting to have an understanding of:
+
[https://www.medchemexpress.com/GDC-0810.html 1365888-06-7 custom synthesis] Psychol. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving together: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 329?36. Richardson, D. C., and Dale, R. (2005). Aiming to understand:
−
Empathy allows us to understand and share others' emotions, creating a bridge amongst the self plus the innermost experiences of a different individual. As we interact with others in our everyday lives, we may possibly respond empathically to one person, but fail to connect with how yet another [https://www.medchemexpress.com/Motesanib.html AMG 706 site] particular person is feeling. While prior research has recommended that particular factors--such as similarity for the target and familiarity with an experience--can trigger empathy (Preston and De Waal, 2002; Mitchell et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2009), incredibly little investigation has examined how interest impacts our ability to empathize. Past analysis suggests that empathy may occur instantaneously and automatically when we recognize another's emotional state (Preston and De Waal, 2002), even if we're cognitively busy. Nonetheless, other investigation suggests that empathy is disrupted when we are distracted and cognitively occupied (Gu and Han, 2007). Mainly because attentional [https://www.medchemexpress.com/AMG-232.html AMG-232 site] sources are typically depleted through everyday interactions, it really is vital to understand if empathy is automatically engaged or calls for controlled and effortful processing. Thus, the current study examines the part of automaticity and focus in neural processes underlying empathy.CORE NEURAL REGIONS FOR EMPATHYA important explanation to appear at empathy for multiple feelings below various attentional circumstances is the fact that it permits for an analysisof core neural regions for empathy. Previous research has identified neural regions which are regularly activated throughout empathy for physical pain (i.e., dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dACC; and anterior insula, AI) (Morrison et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004; Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2005; Zaki et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009; Lamm et al., 2011). These trustworthy activations within the dACC and AI have led some researchers to conclude that these regions are a part of a core network in empathy (Fan et al., 2011). Nonetheless, it is actually unknown whether or not the dACC and AI are essential to empathic processes additional typically (i.e., not only empathy for discomfort) and regardless of whether these regions are activated in the course of empathy for each optimistic and unfavorable feelings. Recent neuroimaging research suggests that other neural regions--such because the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC; BA ten), dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC; BA 9), and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC; BA 11)--may be involved in empathic processes.N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R. A., Bard, E. G. and Jeuniaux, P. (in press). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. Metzing, C., and Brennan, S. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: partner-specific effects around the comprehension of referring expressions. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 201?13. Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Proof of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution.
+
[https://www.medchemexpress.com/AP20187.html AP 20187] empathy enables us to know and share others' feelings, developing a bridge among the self plus the innermost experiences of yet another individual. As we interact with other folks in our each day lives, we may perhaps respond empathically to a single particular person, but fail to connect with how an additional particular person is feeling. Though preceding research has suggested that particular factors--such as similarity for the target and familiarity with an experience--can trigger empathy (Preston and De Waal, 2002; Mitchell et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2009), really small study has examined how focus impacts our potential to empathize. Past study suggests that empathy could happen instantaneously and automatically when we recognize another's emotional state (Preston and De Waal, 2002), even though we're cognitively busy. Nevertheless, other analysis suggests that empathy is disrupted when we're distracted and cognitively occupied (Gu and Han, 2007). Since attentional sources are typically depleted in the course of everyday interactions, it's essential to know if empathy is automatically engaged or demands controlled and effortful processing. As a result, the existing study examines the part of automaticity and focus in neural processes underlying empathy.CORE NEURAL REGIONS FOR EMPATHYA essential explanation to look at empathy for numerous emotions under various attentional situations is the fact that it enables for an analysisof core neural regions for empathy. Previous research has identified neural regions which can be consistently activated during empathy for physical pain (i.e., dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dACC; and anterior insula, AI) (Morrison et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004; Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2005; Zaki et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009; Lamm et al., 2011). These reputable activations in the dACC and AI have led some researchers to conclude that these regions are part of a core network in empathy (Fan et al., 2011). However, it can be unknown whether or not the dACC and AI are necessary to empathic processes additional usually (i.e., not only empathy for pain) and irrespective of whether these regions are activated during empathy for each positive and negative emotions. Recent neuroimaging study suggests that other neural regions--such because the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC; BA 10), dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC; BA 9), and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC; BA 11)--may be involved in empathic processes.N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R. A., Bard, E. G. and Jeuniaux, P. (in press). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. Metzing, C., and Brennan, S. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: partner-specific effects around the comprehension of referring expressions. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 201?13. Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest just before trees: the precedence of worldwide capabilities in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011).

Версія за 08:47, 22 серпня 2017

1365888-06-7 custom synthesis Psychol. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving together: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 329?36. Richardson, D. C., and Dale, R. (2005). Aiming to understand: AP 20187 empathy enables us to know and share others' feelings, developing a bridge among the self plus the innermost experiences of yet another individual. As we interact with other folks in our each day lives, we may perhaps respond empathically to a single particular person, but fail to connect with how an additional particular person is feeling. Though preceding research has suggested that particular factors--such as similarity for the target and familiarity with an experience--can trigger empathy (Preston and De Waal, 2002; Mitchell et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2009), really small study has examined how focus impacts our potential to empathize. Past study suggests that empathy could happen instantaneously and automatically when we recognize another's emotional state (Preston and De Waal, 2002), even though we're cognitively busy. Nevertheless, other analysis suggests that empathy is disrupted when we're distracted and cognitively occupied (Gu and Han, 2007). Since attentional sources are typically depleted in the course of everyday interactions, it's essential to know if empathy is automatically engaged or demands controlled and effortful processing. As a result, the existing study examines the part of automaticity and focus in neural processes underlying empathy.CORE NEURAL REGIONS FOR EMPATHYA essential explanation to look at empathy for numerous emotions under various attentional situations is the fact that it enables for an analysisof core neural regions for empathy. Previous research has identified neural regions which can be consistently activated during empathy for physical pain (i.e., dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dACC; and anterior insula, AI) (Morrison et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004; Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2005; Zaki et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009; Lamm et al., 2011). These reputable activations in the dACC and AI have led some researchers to conclude that these regions are part of a core network in empathy (Fan et al., 2011). However, it can be unknown whether or not the dACC and AI are necessary to empathic processes additional usually (i.e., not only empathy for pain) and irrespective of whether these regions are activated during empathy for each positive and negative emotions. Recent neuroimaging study suggests that other neural regions--such because the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC; BA 10), dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC; BA 9), and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC; BA 11)--may be involved in empathic processes.N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R. A., Bard, E. G. and Jeuniaux, P. (in press). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. Metzing, C., and Brennan, S. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: partner-specific effects around the comprehension of referring expressions. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 201?13. Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest just before trees: the precedence of worldwide capabilities in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011).

Отримано з http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=N_Psychophysiology._Lewin,_K._(1936)._Principles_of_Topological_Psychology._New_York,_NY&oldid=218933