Відмінності між версіями «N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York, NY»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
−
Principles of Topological Psychology. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R. A., Bard, E. G. and Jeuniaux, P. (in press). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. Metzing, C., and Brennan, S. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: partner-specific effects around the comprehension of referring expressions. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 201?13. Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Evidence of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest just before trees: the precedence of worldwide features in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Modest, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes in the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). [http://www.bucksportnext.net/vanilla/discussion/879022/for-instance-inside-a-current-study-reported-in-the-authors-execute-experiments-around-the-erk-map For instance, inside a current study reported in, the authors execute experiments around the ERK/MAPK pathway associated with all the syncytium state of the Drosophila embryo] Moving together: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 329?36. Richardson, D. C., and Dale, R. (2005). Looking to comprehend:
+
Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. Metzing, C., and Brennan, S. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: partner-specific effects around the comprehension of referring expressions. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 201?13. Nadig, A., and [http://community.cosmicradio.tv/discussion/400561/select-this-frames-the-decision-in-a-way-that-biases-participants Select. This frames the decision in a way that biases participants] Sedivy, J. (2002). Proof of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: the precedence of international characteristics in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. Metzing, C., and Brennan, S. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: partner-specific effects around the comprehension of referring expressions. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 201?13. Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Proof of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest ahead of trees: the precedence of worldwide functions in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Smaller, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes in the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving with each other: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 329?36. Richardson, D. C., and Dale, R. (2005). Seeking to recognize:
−
Empathy enables us to know and share others' emotions, creating a bridge in between the self as well as the innermost experiences of an [http://s154.dzzj001.com/comment/html/?47916.html From one participant was excluded because this person responded especially slowly] additional particular person. As we interact with others in our each day lives, we may perhaps respond empathically to 1 person, but fail to connect with how another individual is feeling. When preceding investigation has recommended that particular factors--such as similarity towards the target and familiarity with an experience--can trigger empathy (Preston and De Waal, 2002; Mitchell et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2009), quite little study has examined how interest impacts our capacity to empathize. Previous investigation suggests that empathy may well occur instantaneously and automatically when we recognize another's emotional state (Preston and De Waal, 2002), even when we are cognitively busy. Having said that, other analysis suggests that empathy is disrupted when we're distracted and cognitively occupied (Gu and Han, 2007). Because attentional sources are generally depleted through everyday interactions, it truly is vital to understand if empathy is automatically engaged or demands controlled and effortful processing. As a result, the current study examines the role of automaticity and consideration in neural processes underlying empathy.CORE NEURAL REGIONS FOR EMPATHYA important explanation to appear at empathy for a number of emotions below a range of attentional situations is that it makes it possible for for an analysisof core neural regions for empathy. Prior investigation has identified neural regions which are consistently activated during empathy for physical pain (i.e., dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dACC; and anterior insula, AI) (Morrison et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004; Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2005; Zaki et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009; Lamm et al., 2011). These reputable activations inside the dACC and AI have led some researchers to conclude that these regions are part of a core network in empathy (Fan et al., 2011). Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest ahead of trees: the precedence of global options in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Tiny, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes within the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N.
+
Empathy permits us to know and share others' emotions, making a bridge among the self along with the innermost experiences of one more person. As we interact with other people in our every day lives, we might respond empathically to a single individual, but fail to connect with how an additional particular person is feeling. While previous research has suggested that specific factors--such as similarity for the target and familiarity with an experience--can trigger empathy (Preston and De Waal, 2002; Mitchell et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2009), incredibly small analysis has examined how focus impacts our potential to empathize. Past research suggests that empathy may perhaps happen instantaneously and automatically when we recognize another's emotional state (Preston and De Waal, 2002), even though we're cognitively busy. Nevertheless, other investigation suggests that empathy is disrupted when we're distracted and cognitively occupied (Gu and Han, 2007). Simply because attentional sources are normally depleted throughout daily interactions, it can be important to understand if empathy is automatically engaged or needs controlled and effortful processing. Thus, the present study examines the function of automaticity and attention in neural processes underlying empathy.CORE NEURAL REGIONS FOR EMPATHYA crucial reason to appear at empathy for various emotions beneath a variety of attentional situations is that it allows for an analysisof core neural regions for empathy. Earlier research has identified neural regions which can be consistently activated throughout empathy for physical discomfort (i.e., dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dACC; and anterior insula, AI) (Morrison et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004; Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2005; Zaki et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009; Lamm et al., 2011). These trusted activations in the dACC and AI have led some researchers to conclude that these regions are a part of a core network in empathy (Fan et al., 2011).

Версія за 10:34, 9 вересня 2017

Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. Metzing, C., and Brennan, S. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: partner-specific effects around the comprehension of referring expressions. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 201?13. Nadig, A., and Select. This frames the decision in a way that biases participants Sedivy, J. (2002). Proof of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest before trees: the precedence of international characteristics in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. Metzing, C., and Brennan, S. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: partner-specific effects around the comprehension of referring expressions. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 201?13. Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Proof of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest ahead of trees: the precedence of worldwide functions in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Smaller, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes in the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving with each other: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 329?36. Richardson, D. C., and Dale, R. (2005). Seeking to recognize: Empathy permits us to know and share others' emotions, making a bridge among the self along with the innermost experiences of one more person. As we interact with other people in our every day lives, we might respond empathically to a single individual, but fail to connect with how an additional particular person is feeling. While previous research has suggested that specific factors--such as similarity for the target and familiarity with an experience--can trigger empathy (Preston and De Waal, 2002; Mitchell et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2009), incredibly small analysis has examined how focus impacts our potential to empathize. Past research suggests that empathy may perhaps happen instantaneously and automatically when we recognize another's emotional state (Preston and De Waal, 2002), even though we're cognitively busy. Nevertheless, other investigation suggests that empathy is disrupted when we're distracted and cognitively occupied (Gu and Han, 2007). Simply because attentional sources are normally depleted throughout daily interactions, it can be important to understand if empathy is automatically engaged or needs controlled and effortful processing. Thus, the present study examines the function of automaticity and attention in neural processes underlying empathy.CORE NEURAL REGIONS FOR EMPATHYA crucial reason to appear at empathy for various emotions beneath a variety of attentional situations is that it allows for an analysisof core neural regions for empathy. Earlier research has identified neural regions which can be consistently activated throughout empathy for physical discomfort (i.e., dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dACC; and anterior insula, AI) (Morrison et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004; Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2005; Zaki et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009; Lamm et al., 2011). These trusted activations in the dACC and AI have led some researchers to conclude that these regions are a part of a core network in empathy (Fan et al., 2011).

Отримано з http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=N_Psychophysiology._Lewin,_K._(1936)._Principles_of_Topological_Psychology._New_York,_NY&oldid=227021