Відмінності між версіями «N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York, NY»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м
 
(не показані 13 проміжних версій 12 учасників)
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
−
9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Compact, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes in the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving with each other: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 329?36. Richardson, D. C., and Dale, R. (2005). Wanting to have an understanding of:
+
Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Proof of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. [https://www.medchemexpress.com/GSK2656157.html GSK2656157] Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest ahead of trees: the precedence of international attributes in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Tiny, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes within the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving with each other: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Even though previous study has recommended that specific factors--such as similarity to the target and familiarity with an experience--can trigger empathy (Preston and De Waal, 2002; Mitchell et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2009), really little investigation has examined how interest impacts our potential to empathize. Previous study suggests that empathy may happen instantaneously and automatically when we recognize another's emotional state (Preston and De Waal, 2002), even if we are cognitively busy. On the other hand, other research suggests that empathy is disrupted when we are distracted and cognitively occupied (Gu and Han, 2007). Simply because attentional sources are typically depleted during daily interactions, it is actually significant to understand if empathy is automatically engaged or calls for controlled and effortful processing. Thus, the present study examines the part of automaticity and focus in neural processes underlying empathy.CORE NEURAL REGIONS FOR EMPATHYA essential purpose to look at empathy for many feelings below several different attentional situations is that it makes it possible for for an analysisof core neural regions for empathy. Earlier analysis has identified neural regions which might be regularly activated for the duration of empathy for physical pain (i.e., dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dACC; and anterior insula, AI) (Morrison et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004; Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2005; Zaki et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009; Lamm et al., 2011). These dependable activations within the dACC and AI have led some researchers to conclude that these regions are part of a core network in empathy (Fan et al., 2011). Nevertheless, it's unknown no matter whether the dACC and AI are necessary to empathic processes additional normally (i.e., not just empathy for pain) and whether or not these regions are activated through empathy for each optimistic and adverse feelings. Current neuroimaging investigation suggests that other neural regions--such because the [https://www.medchemexpress.com/GSK2656157.html GSK2656157 web] medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC; BA 10), dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC; BA 9), and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC; BA 11)--may be involved in empathic processes.N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). A., Bard, E. G. and Jeuniaux, P. (in press). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest ahead of trees: the precedence of worldwide attributes in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Little, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes in the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving together: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 329?36. Richardson, D.
−
Empathy allows us to understand and share others' emotions, creating a bridge amongst the self plus the innermost experiences of a different individual. As we interact with others in our everyday lives, we may possibly respond empathically to one person, but fail to connect with how yet another [https://www.medchemexpress.com/Motesanib.html AMG 706 site] particular person is feeling. While prior research has recommended that particular factors--such as similarity for the target and familiarity with an experience--can trigger empathy (Preston and De Waal, 2002; Mitchell et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2009), incredibly little investigation has examined how interest impacts our ability to empathize. Past analysis suggests that empathy may occur instantaneously and automatically when we recognize another's emotional state (Preston and De Waal, 2002), even if we're cognitively busy. Nonetheless, other investigation suggests that empathy is disrupted when we are distracted and cognitively occupied (Gu and Han, 2007). Mainly because attentional [https://www.medchemexpress.com/AMG-232.html AMG-232 site] sources are typically depleted through everyday interactions, it really is vital to understand if empathy is automatically engaged or calls for controlled and effortful processing. Thus, the current study examines the part of automaticity and focus in neural processes underlying empathy.CORE NEURAL REGIONS FOR EMPATHYA important explanation to appear at empathy for multiple feelings below various attentional circumstances is the fact that it permits for an analysisof core neural regions for empathy. Previous research has identified neural regions which are regularly activated throughout empathy for physical pain (i.e., dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dACC; and anterior insula, AI) (Morrison et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004; Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2005; Zaki et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009; Lamm et al., 2011). These trustworthy activations within the dACC and AI have led some researchers to conclude that these regions are a part of a core network in empathy (Fan et al., 2011). Nonetheless, it is actually unknown whether or not the dACC and AI are essential to empathic processes additional typically (i.e., not only empathy for discomfort) and regardless of whether these regions are activated in the course of empathy for each optimistic and unfavorable feelings. Recent neuroimaging research suggests that other neural regions--such because the medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC; BA ten), dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC; BA 9), and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC; BA 11)--may be involved in empathic processes.N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). Principles of Topological Psychology. New York, NY: McGraw Hill. Louwerse, M. M., Dale, R. A., Bard, E. G. and Jeuniaux, P. (in press). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. Metzing, C., and Brennan, S. (2003). When conceptual pacts are broken: partner-specific effects around the comprehension of referring expressions. J. Mem. Lang. 49, 201?13. Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Proof of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution.
+

Поточна версія на 12:44, 9 вересня 2017

Nadig, A., and Sedivy, J. (2002). Proof of perspective-taking constraints in children's on-line reference resolution. GSK2656157 Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest ahead of trees: the precedence of international attributes in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Tiny, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes within the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving with each other: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Even though previous study has recommended that specific factors--such as similarity to the target and familiarity with an experience--can trigger empathy (Preston and De Waal, 2002; Mitchell et al., 2006; Xu et al., 2009), really little investigation has examined how interest impacts our potential to empathize. Previous study suggests that empathy may happen instantaneously and automatically when we recognize another's emotional state (Preston and De Waal, 2002), even if we are cognitively busy. On the other hand, other research suggests that empathy is disrupted when we are distracted and cognitively occupied (Gu and Han, 2007). Simply because attentional sources are typically depleted during daily interactions, it is actually significant to understand if empathy is automatically engaged or calls for controlled and effortful processing. Thus, the present study examines the part of automaticity and focus in neural processes underlying empathy.CORE NEURAL REGIONS FOR EMPATHYA essential purpose to look at empathy for many feelings below several different attentional situations is that it makes it possible for for an analysisof core neural regions for empathy. Earlier analysis has identified neural regions which might be regularly activated for the duration of empathy for physical pain (i.e., dorsal anterior cingulate cortex, dACC; and anterior insula, AI) (Morrison et al., 2004; Singer et al., 2004; Botvinick et al., 2005; Jackson et al., 2005; Zaki et al., 2007; Xu et al., 2009; Lamm et al., 2011). These dependable activations within the dACC and AI have led some researchers to conclude that these regions are part of a core network in empathy (Fan et al., 2011). Nevertheless, it's unknown no matter whether the dACC and AI are necessary to empathic processes additional normally (i.e., not just empathy for pain) and whether or not these regions are activated through empathy for each optimistic and adverse feelings. Current neuroimaging investigation suggests that other neural regions--such because the GSK2656157 web medial prefrontal cortex (MPFC; BA 10), dorsomedial prefrontal cortex (DMPFC; BA 9), and ventromedial prefrontal cortex (VMPFC; BA 11)--may be involved in empathic processes.N Psychophysiology. Lewin, K. (1936). A., Bard, E. G. and Jeuniaux, P. (in press). Behavior matching in multimodal communication is synchronized. Cogn. Sci. Psychol. Sci. 13, 329?36. Navon, D. (1977). Forest ahead of trees: the precedence of worldwide attributes in visual perception. Cogn. Psychol. 9, 353?83. Norris, C. J., Chen, E. E., Zhu, D. C., Little, S. L., and Cacioppo, J. T. (2004). The interaction of social and emotional processes in the brain. J. Cogn. Neurosci. 16, 1818?829. Obhi, S. S., and Sebanz, N. (2011). Moving together: toward understanding the mechanisms of joint action. Exp. Brain Res. 211, 329?36. Richardson, D.

Отримано з http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=N_Psychophysiology._Lewin,_K._(1936)._Principles_of_Topological_Psychology._New_York,_NY&oldid=227045