Відмінності між версіями «Nded on experimental basis, represents a different discontinuity point with respect to»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м
 
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
−
Third, molecular and genetic adjustments, involving each the epithelial and also the stromal cells, ought to consequently be investigated in association and linked for the observed modification in the context. [http://www.medchemexpress.com/TCN238.html TCN238 biological activity] Although significantly has been discovered about molecular elements and subcellular processes, the integration of data and models across a wide array of spatial and temporal scales, taking us from observations at the cellular or subcellular level to understand tissue level phenomena, remains an unchartered territory. In addition, biophysical influences on cell behavior and differentiation might be adequately appreciated only by studying cells in their three-dimensional context and are as a result disregarded by existing experimental methodologies practically totally depending on 2D cultures. All round, these considerations highlight one more basic bias of contemporary biology, that is, the lack of a common theory for understanding biological organization. In order to cope using the increasingly appreciated complexity of living organism, implicitly, biologists have adopted a reductive method, mainly depending on a gene-centric paradigm, where causative processes are modelled based on a simplified, linear dynamics. Having said that, reality is much more complicated than the biochemical diagrams we are asked to trust. Biological complexity entails nonlinear dynamics, stochastic gene expression, interactions amongst biochemical and biophysical components, and events acting simultaneously at various levels. From molecules to organs, [http://www.medchemexpress.com/AKT-inhibitor.html AKT protein kinase inhibitor chemical information] levels are interrelated and interdependent, to ensure that the organism is able to conserve and adapt the integrity of its structural and functional organization against a back-drop of continuous changes within the organism and its environment. That feature represents the updated interpretation of homeostasis, a notion formulated a century ago by W. Cannon and currently reinterpreted as autoconservation [117], functional stability [118], evolvability, or robustness [119]. Given that homeostasis is significantly threatened or perhaps disrupted within the course of quite a few diseases, to know such processes we are obligatory needed to apply methodologies that explore nonlinear spatiotemporal systems with multiple levels of structural and functional organization. As pointedly discussed by Noble [120], a single can not have an understanding of the physiology or the pathology of cardiac rhythm by only referring for the gene expression and for the characteristics of a single cardiomyocite. Similarly 1 can't comprehend pathologic processes emerging at the cellmicroenvironment level by only referring to "abstract" generegulatory circuits within the isolated cell.five. Microenvironment and Cancer: Methodological IssuesThe term "microenvironment" encompasses discrete, interacting components, which include extracellular matrix (ECM), stromal cells, molecular diffusible components, configuration from the cellstroma architecture [104], nonlocal contro.Nded on experimental basis, represents a further discontinuity point with respect to SMT which posits that "biologicalinformation" carried out by genes constitutes the only (or the key) causative element in driving cellular fate and behavior.5 levels. This can lead to models of tissues and organisms with enhanced predictive energy [114]. Second, tissue and cytoskeleton/nucleoskeleton architecture, too as mechanical forces (stiffness, shear tension [115], and surface tension), should be adequately weighted and investigated, a rather unusual request to get a "traditional" biologist [116]. Third, molecular and genetic adjustments, involving each the epithelial and the stromal cells, ought to thus be investigated in association and linked to the observed modification of the context. Even though significantly has been learned about molecular components and subcellular processes, the integration of information and models across a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, taking us from observations in the cellular or subcellular level to know tissue level phenomena, remains an unchartered territory.
+
Nded on experimental basis, represents yet another [http://www.medchemexpress.com/VU0361737.html VU0361737MedChemExpress ML-128] discontinuity point with respect to SMT which posits that "biologicalinformation" carried out by genes constitutes the only (or the main) causative element in driving cellular fate and behavior.five levels. This can lead to models of tissues and organisms with enhanced predictive energy [114]. Second, tissue and cytoskeleton/nucleoskeleton architecture, as well as mechanical forces (stiffness, shear strain [115], and surface tension), has to be adequately weighted and investigated, a rather unusual request to get a "traditional" biologist [116]. Third, molecular and genetic modifications, involving each the epithelial and also the stromal cells, should consequently be investigated in association and linked for the observed [http://www.medchemexpress.com/Lodoxamide.html LodoxamideMedChemExpress Lodoxamide] modification in the context. Although significantly has been learned about molecular elements and subcellular processes, the integration of data and models across a wide array of spatial and temporal scales, taking us from observations at the cellular or subcellular level to know tissue level phenomena, remains an unchartered territory. In addition, biophysical influences on cell behavior and differentiation might be adequately appreciated only by studying cells in their three-dimensional context and are as a result disregarded by existing experimental methodologies practically totally depending on 2D cultures. All round, these considerations highlight one more basic bias of modern biology, that is, the lack of a common theory for understanding biological organization. So that you can cope with the increasingly appreciated complexity of living organism, implicitly, biologists have adopted a reductive method, mainly according to a gene-centric paradigm, where causative processes are modelled based on a simplified, linear dynamics. On the other hand, reality is much more complex than the biochemical diagrams we are asked to trust. Biological complexity entails nonlinear dynamics, stochastic gene expression, interactions amongst biochemical and biophysical components, and events acting simultaneously at different levels. From molecules to organs, levels are interrelated and interdependent, to ensure that the organism is able to conserve and adapt the integrity of its structural and functional organization against a back-drop of continuous changes within the organism and its environment. That feature represents the updated interpretation of homeostasis, a idea formulated a century ago by W. Cannon and currently reinterpreted as autoconservation [117], functional stability [118], evolvability, or robustness [119]. Given that homeostasis is significantly threatened or perhaps disrupted in the course of quite a few diseases, to know such processes we're obligatory needed to apply methodologies that explore nonlinear spatiotemporal systems with multiple levels of structural and functional organization. As pointedly discussed by Noble [120], a single can not fully grasp the physiology or the pathology of cardiac rhythm by only referring for the gene expression and for the characteristics of a single cardiomyocite. Similarly 1 can't understand pathologic processes emerging at the cellmicroenvironment level by only referring to "abstract" generegulatory circuits within the isolated cell.five. Microenvironment and Cancer: Methodological IssuesThe term "microenvironment" encompasses discrete, interacting components, for instance extracellular matrix (ECM), stromal cells, molecular diffusible variables, configuration of the cellstroma architecture [104], nonlocal contro.Nded on experimental basis, represents a different discontinuity point with respect to SMT which posits that "biologicalinformation" carried out by genes constitutes the only (or the main) causative aspect in driving cellular fate and behavior.five levels. This may result in models of tissues and organisms with enhanced predictive energy [114].

Поточна версія на 04:21, 31 березня 2018

Nded on experimental basis, represents yet another VU0361737MedChemExpress ML-128 discontinuity point with respect to SMT which posits that "biologicalinformation" carried out by genes constitutes the only (or the main) causative element in driving cellular fate and behavior.five levels. This can lead to models of tissues and organisms with enhanced predictive energy [114]. Second, tissue and cytoskeleton/nucleoskeleton architecture, as well as mechanical forces (stiffness, shear strain [115], and surface tension), has to be adequately weighted and investigated, a rather unusual request to get a "traditional" biologist [116]. Third, molecular and genetic modifications, involving each the epithelial and also the stromal cells, should consequently be investigated in association and linked for the observed LodoxamideMedChemExpress Lodoxamide modification in the context. Although significantly has been learned about molecular elements and subcellular processes, the integration of data and models across a wide array of spatial and temporal scales, taking us from observations at the cellular or subcellular level to know tissue level phenomena, remains an unchartered territory. In addition, biophysical influences on cell behavior and differentiation might be adequately appreciated only by studying cells in their three-dimensional context and are as a result disregarded by existing experimental methodologies practically totally depending on 2D cultures. All round, these considerations highlight one more basic bias of modern biology, that is, the lack of a common theory for understanding biological organization. So that you can cope with the increasingly appreciated complexity of living organism, implicitly, biologists have adopted a reductive method, mainly according to a gene-centric paradigm, where causative processes are modelled based on a simplified, linear dynamics. On the other hand, reality is much more complex than the biochemical diagrams we are asked to trust. Biological complexity entails nonlinear dynamics, stochastic gene expression, interactions amongst biochemical and biophysical components, and events acting simultaneously at different levels. From molecules to organs, levels are interrelated and interdependent, to ensure that the organism is able to conserve and adapt the integrity of its structural and functional organization against a back-drop of continuous changes within the organism and its environment. That feature represents the updated interpretation of homeostasis, a idea formulated a century ago by W. Cannon and currently reinterpreted as autoconservation [117], functional stability [118], evolvability, or robustness [119]. Given that homeostasis is significantly threatened or perhaps disrupted in the course of quite a few diseases, to know such processes we're obligatory needed to apply methodologies that explore nonlinear spatiotemporal systems with multiple levels of structural and functional organization. As pointedly discussed by Noble [120], a single can not fully grasp the physiology or the pathology of cardiac rhythm by only referring for the gene expression and for the characteristics of a single cardiomyocite. Similarly 1 can't understand pathologic processes emerging at the cellmicroenvironment level by only referring to "abstract" generegulatory circuits within the isolated cell.five. Microenvironment and Cancer: Methodological IssuesThe term "microenvironment" encompasses discrete, interacting components, for instance extracellular matrix (ECM), stromal cells, molecular diffusible variables, configuration of the cellstroma architecture [104], nonlocal contro.Nded on experimental basis, represents a different discontinuity point with respect to SMT which posits that "biologicalinformation" carried out by genes constitutes the only (or the main) causative aspect in driving cellular fate and behavior.five levels. This may result in models of tissues and organisms with enhanced predictive energy [114].

Отримано з http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Nded_on_experimental_basis,_represents_a_different_discontinuity_point_with_respect_to&oldid=308502