Відмінності між версіями «Nded on experimental basis, represents a further discontinuity point with respect to»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
(Створена сторінка: Provided that homeostasis is significantly threatened or even [http://landscape4me.com/members/sinkpanty37/activity/3745371/ Fraternity. Di Bella's remedy consi...)
 
м
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
Provided that homeostasis is significantly threatened or even [http://landscape4me.com/members/sinkpanty37/activity/3745371/ Fraternity. Di Bella's remedy consists of an unpublished concoction] disrupted in the course of numerous diseases, to know such processes we're obligatory required to apply methodologies that explore nonlinear spatiotemporal systems with numerous levels of structural and functional organization. As pointedly discussed by Noble [120], 1 can not have an understanding of the physiology or the pathology of cardiac rhythm by only referring towards the gene expression and towards the features of a single cardiomyocite.Nded on experimental basis, represents a further discontinuity point with respect to SMT which posits that "biologicalinformation" carried out by genes constitutes the only (or the primary) causative issue in driving cellular fate and behavior.five levels. This will lead to models of tissues and organisms with enhanced predictive energy [114]. Second, tissue and cytoskeleton/nucleoskeleton architecture, at the same time as mechanical forces (stiffness, shear tension [115], and surface tension), have to be adequately weighted and investigated, a rather unusual request to get a "traditional" biologist [116]. Third, molecular and genetic changes, involving each the epithelial and the stromal cells, should thus be investigated in association and linked to the observed modification from the context. While a great deal has been discovered about molecular elements and subcellular processes, the integration of data and models across a wide selection of spatial and temporal scales, taking us from observations in the cellular or subcellular level to understand tissue level phenomena, remains an unchartered territory. In addition, biophysical influences on cell behavior and differentiation can be adequately appreciated only by studying cells in their three-dimensional context and are for that reason disregarded by existing experimental methodologies nearly completely determined by 2D cultures. All round, these considerations highlight another fundamental bias of contemporary biology, that's, the lack of a common theory for understanding biological organization.Nded on experimental basis, represents a further discontinuity point with respect to SMT which posits that "biologicalinformation" carried out by genes constitutes the only (or the primary) causative issue in driving cellular fate and behavior.five levels. This can result in models of tissues and organisms with enhanced predictive energy [114]. Second, tissue and cytoskeleton/nucleoskeleton architecture, at the same time as mechanical forces (stiffness, shear pressure [115], and surface tension), must be adequately weighted and investigated, a rather unusual request to get a "traditional" biologist [116]. Third, molecular and genetic alterations, involving both the epithelial as well as the stromal cells, must for that reason be investigated in association and linked for the observed modification of your context. Even though significantly has been discovered about molecular elements and subcellular processes, the integration of information and models across a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, taking us from observations in the cellular or subcellular level to know tissue level phenomena, remains an unchartered territory. Furthermore, biophysical influences on cell behavior and differentiation might be adequately appreciated only by studying cells in their three-dimensional context and are for that reason disregarded by present experimental methodologies pretty much fully based on 2D cultures. Overall, these considerations highlight an additional basic bias of modern day biology, that may be, the lack of a common theory for understanding biological organization. So as to cope with all the increasingly appreciated complexity of living organism, implicitly, biologists have adopted a reductive approach, mainly based on a gene-centric paradigm, where causative processes are modelled in accordance with a simplified, linear dynamics.
+
From molecules to organs, levels are interrelated and interdependent, so that the organism is in a position to conserve and adapt the integrity of its structural and functional organization against a back-drop of continuous adjustments inside the organism and its atmosphere.Nded on experimental basis, represents another discontinuity point with respect to SMT which posits that "biologicalinformation" carried out by genes constitutes the only (or the principle) causative issue in driving cellular fate and behavior.5 levels. This may lead to models of tissues and organisms with enhanced predictive power [114]. Second, tissue and cytoskeleton/nucleoskeleton architecture, at the same time as mechanical [http://mateonow.com/members/temple35file/activity/712700/ Fraternity. Di Bella's remedy consists of an unpublished concoction] forces (stiffness, shear strain [115], and surface tension), should be adequately weighted and investigated, a rather unusual request for any "traditional" biologist [116]. Third, molecular and genetic alterations, involving each the epithelial plus the stromal cells, should consequently be investigated in association and linked to the observed modification on the context. While substantially has been discovered about molecular elements and subcellular processes, the integration of data and models across a wide selection of spatial and temporal scales, taking us from observations in the cellular or subcellular level to understand tissue level phenomena, remains an unchartered territory. Furthermore, biophysical influences on cell behavior and differentiation could be adequately appreciated only by studying cells in their three-dimensional context and are thus disregarded by existing experimental methodologies pretty much completely based on 2D cultures. General, these considerations highlight an additional fundamental bias of contemporary biology, that is definitely, the lack of a general theory for understanding biological organization. In an effort to cope with all the increasingly appreciated complexity of living organism, implicitly, biologists have adopted a reductive approach, mostly depending on a gene-centric paradigm, exactly where causative processes are modelled based on a simplified, linear dynamics. Nonetheless, reality is much more complex than the biochemical diagrams we are asked to trust.Nded on experimental basis, represents a different discontinuity point with respect to SMT which posits that "biologicalinformation" carried out by genes constitutes the only (or the main) causative factor in driving cellular fate and behavior.five levels. This may result in models of tissues and organisms with enhanced predictive power [114]. Second, tissue and cytoskeleton/nucleoskeleton architecture, too as mechanical forces (stiffness, shear tension [115], and surface tension), have to be adequately weighted and investigated, a rather uncommon request to get a "traditional" biologist [116]. Third, molecular and genetic changes, involving each the epithelial as well as the stromal cells, ought to for that reason be investigated in association and linked for the observed modification in the context. Though much has been learned about molecular elements and subcellular processes, the integration of information and models across a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, taking us from observations in the cellular or subcellular level to understand tissue level phenomena, remains an unchartered territory. In addition, biophysical influences on cell behavior and differentiation can be adequately appreciated only by studying cells in their three-dimensional context and are as a result disregarded by present experimental methodologies virtually totally according to 2D cultures. General, these considerations highlight one more basic bias of modern day biology, that may be, the lack of a basic theory for understanding biological organization. So that you can cope with the increasingly appreciated complexity of living organism, implicitly, biologists have adopted a reductive method, primarily determined by a gene-centric paradigm, exactly where causative processes are modelled according to a simplified, linear dynamics.

Версія за 08:06, 22 березня 2018

From molecules to organs, levels are interrelated and interdependent, so that the organism is in a position to conserve and adapt the integrity of its structural and functional organization against a back-drop of continuous adjustments inside the organism and its atmosphere.Nded on experimental basis, represents another discontinuity point with respect to SMT which posits that "biologicalinformation" carried out by genes constitutes the only (or the principle) causative issue in driving cellular fate and behavior.5 levels. This may lead to models of tissues and organisms with enhanced predictive power [114]. Second, tissue and cytoskeleton/nucleoskeleton architecture, at the same time as mechanical Fraternity. Di Bella's remedy consists of an unpublished concoction forces (stiffness, shear strain [115], and surface tension), should be adequately weighted and investigated, a rather unusual request for any "traditional" biologist [116]. Third, molecular and genetic alterations, involving each the epithelial plus the stromal cells, should consequently be investigated in association and linked to the observed modification on the context. While substantially has been discovered about molecular elements and subcellular processes, the integration of data and models across a wide selection of spatial and temporal scales, taking us from observations in the cellular or subcellular level to understand tissue level phenomena, remains an unchartered territory. Furthermore, biophysical influences on cell behavior and differentiation could be adequately appreciated only by studying cells in their three-dimensional context and are thus disregarded by existing experimental methodologies pretty much completely based on 2D cultures. General, these considerations highlight an additional fundamental bias of contemporary biology, that is definitely, the lack of a general theory for understanding biological organization. In an effort to cope with all the increasingly appreciated complexity of living organism, implicitly, biologists have adopted a reductive approach, mostly depending on a gene-centric paradigm, exactly where causative processes are modelled based on a simplified, linear dynamics. Nonetheless, reality is much more complex than the biochemical diagrams we are asked to trust.Nded on experimental basis, represents a different discontinuity point with respect to SMT which posits that "biologicalinformation" carried out by genes constitutes the only (or the main) causative factor in driving cellular fate and behavior.five levels. This may result in models of tissues and organisms with enhanced predictive power [114]. Second, tissue and cytoskeleton/nucleoskeleton architecture, too as mechanical forces (stiffness, shear tension [115], and surface tension), have to be adequately weighted and investigated, a rather uncommon request to get a "traditional" biologist [116]. Third, molecular and genetic changes, involving each the epithelial as well as the stromal cells, ought to for that reason be investigated in association and linked for the observed modification in the context. Though much has been learned about molecular elements and subcellular processes, the integration of information and models across a wide range of spatial and temporal scales, taking us from observations in the cellular or subcellular level to understand tissue level phenomena, remains an unchartered territory. In addition, biophysical influences on cell behavior and differentiation can be adequately appreciated only by studying cells in their three-dimensional context and are as a result disregarded by present experimental methodologies virtually totally according to 2D cultures. General, these considerations highlight one more basic bias of modern day biology, that may be, the lack of a basic theory for understanding biological organization. So that you can cope with the increasingly appreciated complexity of living organism, implicitly, biologists have adopted a reductive method, primarily determined by a gene-centric paradigm, exactly where causative processes are modelled according to a simplified, linear dynamics.