Відмінності між версіями «Nded on experimental basis, represents one more discontinuity point with respect to»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м
 
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
While significantly has been learned about molecular components and subcellular processes, the integration of information and models across a wide selection of spatial and temporal scales, taking us from observations at the cellular or subcellular level to know tissue level phenomena, remains an unchartered territory. Moreover, biophysical influences on cell behavior and differentiation might be adequately appreciated only by studying cells in their three-dimensional context and are thus disregarded by present experimental methodologies pretty much completely based on 2D cultures. General, these considerations highlight a different basic bias of modern biology, that may be, the lack of a common theory for understanding [http://ques2ans.gatentry.com/index.php?qa=62487&qa_1=title-loaded-from-file The presence of other people {and] biological organization. So as to cope with the increasingly appreciated complexity of living organism, implicitly, biologists have adopted a reductive method, mostly determined by a gene-centric paradigm, exactly where causative processes are modelled based on a simplified, [http://campuscrimes.tv/members/gongmeter12/activity/596636/ evaluation of Rubenson et al. (2011; Fig. 7) indicates that hip adduction] linear dynamics. Nonetheless, reality is far more complex than the biochemical diagrams we are asked to trust. Biological complexity entails nonlinear dynamics, stochastic gene expression, interactions between biochemical and biophysical factors, and events acting simultaneously at various levels. From molecules to organs, levels are interrelated and interdependent, in order that the organism is able to conserve and adapt the integrity of its structural and functional organization against a back-drop of continuous changes within the organism and its environment. That feature represents the updated interpretation of homeostasis, a concept formulated a century ago by W. Cannon and at the moment reinterpreted as autoconservation [117], functional stability [118], evolvability, or robustness [119]. Given that homeostasis is considerably threatened or perhaps disrupted in the course of a number of ailments, to understand such processes we are obligatory essential to apply methodologies that discover nonlinear spatiotemporal systems with numerous levels of structural and functional organization. As pointedly discussed by Noble [120], 1 cannot have an understanding of the physiology or the pathology of cardiac rhythm by only referring towards the gene expression and for the options of a single cardiomyocite. Similarly 1 cannot realize pathologic processes emerging at the cellmicroenvironment level by only referring to "abstract" generegulatory circuits in the isolated cell.five. Microenvironment and Cancer: Methodological IssuesThe term "microenvironment" encompasses discrete, interacting elements, including extracellular matrix (ECM), stromal cells, molecular diffusible elements, configuration with the cellstroma architecture [104], nonlocal contro.Nded on experimental basis, represents a different discontinuity point with respect to SMT which posits that "biologicalinformation" carried out by genes constitutes the only (or the main) causative element in driving cellular fate and behavior.five levels. This may lead to models of tissues and organisms with enhanced predictive power [114]. Second, tissue and cytoskeleton/nucleoskeleton architecture, also as mechanical forces (stiffness, shear pressure [115], and surface tension), should be adequately weighted and investigated, a rather uncommon request for a "traditional" biologist [116]. Third, molecular and genetic changes, involving each the epithelial along with the stromal cells, ought to for that reason be investigated in association and linked for the observed modification of your context. Despite the fact that a lot has been learned about molecular components and subcellular processes, the integration of data and models across a wide selection of spatial and temporal scales, taking us from observations in the cellular or subcellular level to understand tissue level phenomena, remains an unchartered territory.
+
From molecules to organs, levels are interrelated and interdependent, in order that the organism is capable to conserve and adapt the integrity of its structural and functional organization against a back-drop of continuous alterations within the organism and its atmosphere. That feature represents the updated interpretation of homeostasis, a concept formulated a century ago by W. Cannon and currently reinterpreted as autoconservation [117], functional stability [118], evolvability, or robustness [119]. Provided that homeostasis is substantially threatened or even disrupted in the course of several ailments, to know such processes we're obligatory essential to apply methodologies that discover nonlinear spatiotemporal systems with several levels of structural and functional organization. As pointedly discussed by Noble [120], a single can not understand the physiology or the pathology of cardiac rhythm by only referring towards the gene expression and towards the capabilities of a single cardiomyocite. Similarly a single can not recognize pathologic processes emerging at the cellmicroenvironment level by only referring to "abstract" generegulatory circuits within the isolated cell.5. Microenvironment and Cancer: Methodological IssuesThe term "microenvironment" encompasses discrete, interacting elements, for instance extracellular matrix (ECM), stromal cells, molecular diffusible variables, configuration of your cellstroma architecture [104], nonlocal contro.Nded on experimental basis, represents a further discontinuity point with respect to SMT which posits that "biologicalinformation" carried out by genes constitutes the only (or the main) causative aspect in driving cellular fate and behavior.five levels. This will likely lead to models of tissues and organisms with enhanced predictive energy [114]. Second, tissue and cytoskeleton/nucleoskeleton architecture, as well as mechanical forces (stiffness, shear anxiety [115], and surface tension), has to be adequately weighted and investigated, a rather unusual request to get a "traditional" biologist [116]. Third, molecular and genetic changes, involving each the epithelial plus the stromal cells, ought to hence be investigated in association and linked for the observed modification with the context. Although much has been discovered about molecular components and subcellular processes, the integration of data and models across a wide selection of spatial and temporal scales, taking us from observations at the cellular or subcellular level to know tissue level phenomena, remains an unchartered territory. Moreover, biophysical influences on cell behavior and differentiation can be adequately appreciated only by studying cells in their three-dimensional context and are as a result disregarded by present experimental methodologies just about fully determined by 2D cultures. Overall, these considerations highlight one more fundamental bias of contemporary biology, that is definitely, the lack of a basic theory for understanding biological organization. So as to cope using the increasingly appreciated complexity of living organism, implicitly, biologists have adopted a reductive approach, mainly based on a gene-centric paradigm, where causative processes are modelled according to a simplified, linear dynamics. Having said that, reality is far more complicated than the biochemical diagrams we are asked to trust. Biological complexity entails nonlinear dynamics, stochastic gene expression, interactions involving biochemical and biophysical factors, and events acting simultaneously at various levels. From molecules to organs, levels are interrelated and interdependent, so that the organism is able to conserve and adapt the integrity of its structural and functional organization against a back-drop of continuous adjustments within the organism and its atmosphere. [http://www.insidehumanmind.com/members/boyseed86/activity/215590/ L by way of field's forces [105], and topologic geometry of your emerging] Offered that homeostasis is significantly threatened or even disrupted within the course of many diseases, to understand such processes we are obligatory essential to apply methodologies that explore nonlinear spatiotemporal systems with many levels of structural and functional organization.

Поточна версія на 19:46, 15 березня 2018

From molecules to organs, levels are interrelated and interdependent, in order that the organism is capable to conserve and adapt the integrity of its structural and functional organization against a back-drop of continuous alterations within the organism and its atmosphere. That feature represents the updated interpretation of homeostasis, a concept formulated a century ago by W. Cannon and currently reinterpreted as autoconservation [117], functional stability [118], evolvability, or robustness [119]. Provided that homeostasis is substantially threatened or even disrupted in the course of several ailments, to know such processes we're obligatory essential to apply methodologies that discover nonlinear spatiotemporal systems with several levels of structural and functional organization. As pointedly discussed by Noble [120], a single can not understand the physiology or the pathology of cardiac rhythm by only referring towards the gene expression and towards the capabilities of a single cardiomyocite. Similarly a single can not recognize pathologic processes emerging at the cellmicroenvironment level by only referring to "abstract" generegulatory circuits within the isolated cell.5. Microenvironment and Cancer: Methodological IssuesThe term "microenvironment" encompasses discrete, interacting elements, for instance extracellular matrix (ECM), stromal cells, molecular diffusible variables, configuration of your cellstroma architecture [104], nonlocal contro.Nded on experimental basis, represents a further discontinuity point with respect to SMT which posits that "biologicalinformation" carried out by genes constitutes the only (or the main) causative aspect in driving cellular fate and behavior.five levels. This will likely lead to models of tissues and organisms with enhanced predictive energy [114]. Second, tissue and cytoskeleton/nucleoskeleton architecture, as well as mechanical forces (stiffness, shear anxiety [115], and surface tension), has to be adequately weighted and investigated, a rather unusual request to get a "traditional" biologist [116]. Third, molecular and genetic changes, involving each the epithelial plus the stromal cells, ought to hence be investigated in association and linked for the observed modification with the context. Although much has been discovered about molecular components and subcellular processes, the integration of data and models across a wide selection of spatial and temporal scales, taking us from observations at the cellular or subcellular level to know tissue level phenomena, remains an unchartered territory. Moreover, biophysical influences on cell behavior and differentiation can be adequately appreciated only by studying cells in their three-dimensional context and are as a result disregarded by present experimental methodologies just about fully determined by 2D cultures. Overall, these considerations highlight one more fundamental bias of contemporary biology, that is definitely, the lack of a basic theory for understanding biological organization. So as to cope using the increasingly appreciated complexity of living organism, implicitly, biologists have adopted a reductive approach, mainly based on a gene-centric paradigm, where causative processes are modelled according to a simplified, linear dynamics. Having said that, reality is far more complicated than the biochemical diagrams we are asked to trust. Biological complexity entails nonlinear dynamics, stochastic gene expression, interactions involving biochemical and biophysical factors, and events acting simultaneously at various levels. From molecules to organs, levels are interrelated and interdependent, so that the organism is able to conserve and adapt the integrity of its structural and functional organization against a back-drop of continuous adjustments within the organism and its atmosphere. L by way of field's forces [105, and topologic geometry of your emerging] Offered that homeostasis is significantly threatened or even disrupted within the course of many diseases, to understand such processes we are obligatory essential to apply methodologies that explore nonlinear spatiotemporal systems with many levels of structural and functional organization.