Відмінності між версіями «Nded on experimental basis, represents yet another discontinuity point with respect to»
м |
м |
||
| Рядок 1: | Рядок 1: | ||
| − | + | Second, tissue and cytoskeleton/nucleoskeleton architecture, as well as mechanical forces (stiffness, shear pressure [115], and surface tension), has to be adequately weighted and investigated, a rather unusual request for a "traditional" biologist [116]. Third, molecular and genetic adjustments, involving both the epithelial and also the stromal cells, need to consequently be investigated in association and linked towards the observed modification in the context. Though a great deal has been discovered about molecular elements and subcellular processes, the integration of information and models across a wide array of spatial and temporal scales, taking us from observations in the cellular or subcellular level to understand tissue level phenomena, remains an unchartered territory. In addition, biophysical influences on cell behavior and differentiation may be adequately appreciated only by studying cells in their three-dimensional context and are consequently disregarded by current experimental methodologies virtually totally determined by 2D cultures. Overall, these considerations highlight an additional fundamental bias of contemporary biology, which is, the lack of a general theory for understanding biological organization. As a way to cope with all the increasingly appreciated complexity of living organism, implicitly, biologists have adopted a reductive approach, primarily according to a gene-centric paradigm, where causative processes are modelled in line with a simplified, linear dynamics. Having said that, reality is much more complicated than the biochemical diagrams we are asked to trust. Biological complexity entails nonlinear dynamics, stochastic gene expression, interactions amongst biochemical and biophysical variables, and events acting simultaneously at unique levels. From molecules to organs, levels are interrelated and interdependent, so that the organism is in a position to conserve and adapt the integrity of its structural and functional organization against a back-drop of continuous adjustments inside the organism and its atmosphere. That function represents the updated interpretation of homeostasis, a notion formulated a century ago by W. Cannon and presently reinterpreted as autoconservation [117], functional stability [118], evolvability, or robustness [119]. Offered that homeostasis is drastically threatened or even disrupted inside the course of quite a few diseases, to know such processes we're obligatory required to apply methodologies that explore nonlinear spatiotemporal systems with many levels of structural and functional organization. As pointedly discussed by Noble [120], one can not recognize the [http://www.medchemexpress.com/lasmiditan.html COL-144 custom synthesis] physiology or the pathology of cardiac rhythm by only referring to the gene expression and towards the functions of a single cardiomyocite. Similarly one particular can't have an understanding of pathologic processes emerging in the [http://www.medchemexpress.com/TCN238.html TCN238MedChemExpress TCN238] cellmicroenvironment level by only referring to "abstract" generegulatory circuits inside the isolated cell.5. Microenvironment and Cancer: Methodological IssuesThe term "microenvironment" encompasses discrete, interacting components, which include extracellular matrix (ECM), stromal cells, molecular diffusible things, configuration from the cellstroma architecture [104], nonlocal contro.Nded on experimental basis, represents yet another discontinuity point with respect to SMT which posits that "biologicalinformation" carried out by genes constitutes the only (or the primary) causative issue in driving cellular fate and behavior.5 levels. This may lead to models of tissues and organisms with enhanced predictive energy [114]. Second, tissue and cytoskeleton/nucleoskeleton architecture, also as mechanical forces (stiffness, shear anxiety [115], and surface tension), must be adequately weighted and investigated, a rather unusual request to get a "traditional" biologist [116]. As pointedly discussed by Noble [120], 1 can't have an understanding of the physiology or the pathology of cardiac rhythm by only referring to the gene expression and to the options of a single cardiomyocite. | |
Поточна версія на 03:01, 23 березня 2018
Second, tissue and cytoskeleton/nucleoskeleton architecture, as well as mechanical forces (stiffness, shear pressure [115], and surface tension), has to be adequately weighted and investigated, a rather unusual request for a "traditional" biologist [116]. Third, molecular and genetic adjustments, involving both the epithelial and also the stromal cells, need to consequently be investigated in association and linked towards the observed modification in the context. Though a great deal has been discovered about molecular elements and subcellular processes, the integration of information and models across a wide array of spatial and temporal scales, taking us from observations in the cellular or subcellular level to understand tissue level phenomena, remains an unchartered territory. In addition, biophysical influences on cell behavior and differentiation may be adequately appreciated only by studying cells in their three-dimensional context and are consequently disregarded by current experimental methodologies virtually totally determined by 2D cultures. Overall, these considerations highlight an additional fundamental bias of contemporary biology, which is, the lack of a general theory for understanding biological organization. As a way to cope with all the increasingly appreciated complexity of living organism, implicitly, biologists have adopted a reductive approach, primarily according to a gene-centric paradigm, where causative processes are modelled in line with a simplified, linear dynamics. Having said that, reality is much more complicated than the biochemical diagrams we are asked to trust. Biological complexity entails nonlinear dynamics, stochastic gene expression, interactions amongst biochemical and biophysical variables, and events acting simultaneously at unique levels. From molecules to organs, levels are interrelated and interdependent, so that the organism is in a position to conserve and adapt the integrity of its structural and functional organization against a back-drop of continuous adjustments inside the organism and its atmosphere. That function represents the updated interpretation of homeostasis, a notion formulated a century ago by W. Cannon and presently reinterpreted as autoconservation [117], functional stability [118], evolvability, or robustness [119]. Offered that homeostasis is drastically threatened or even disrupted inside the course of quite a few diseases, to know such processes we're obligatory required to apply methodologies that explore nonlinear spatiotemporal systems with many levels of structural and functional organization. As pointedly discussed by Noble [120], one can not recognize the COL-144 custom synthesis physiology or the pathology of cardiac rhythm by only referring to the gene expression and towards the functions of a single cardiomyocite. Similarly one particular can't have an understanding of pathologic processes emerging in the TCN238MedChemExpress TCN238 cellmicroenvironment level by only referring to "abstract" generegulatory circuits inside the isolated cell.5. Microenvironment and Cancer: Methodological IssuesThe term "microenvironment" encompasses discrete, interacting components, which include extracellular matrix (ECM), stromal cells, molecular diffusible things, configuration from the cellstroma architecture [104], nonlocal contro.Nded on experimental basis, represents yet another discontinuity point with respect to SMT which posits that "biologicalinformation" carried out by genes constitutes the only (or the primary) causative issue in driving cellular fate and behavior.5 levels. This may lead to models of tissues and organisms with enhanced predictive energy [114]. Second, tissue and cytoskeleton/nucleoskeleton architecture, also as mechanical forces (stiffness, shear anxiety [115], and surface tension), must be adequately weighted and investigated, a rather unusual request to get a "traditional" biologist [116]. As pointedly discussed by Noble [120], 1 can't have an understanding of the physiology or the pathology of cardiac rhythm by only referring to the gene expression and to the options of a single cardiomyocite.
