Ons assessed across the whole sample persisted when examining only gang-affiliated

In the 162 youth enrolled in Yo Puedo, nearly half (48.1 ) was Cs was examined paired with getting close friends who program to gang-affiliated (Table 1). Most youth, almost two-thirds, aspired to graduate from a 4-year college and practically 50 identified an inability to spend for their education as the most significant barrier to obtaining as far as they would like in school. Gang-affiliated youth had been extra than twice as probably to report weekly alcohol use (30 vs. 11.9 , p=0.01) and weekly marijuana use (46.2 vs. 17.9 , pG0.01). Of note, compared to non-affiliated youth, gang-affiliated youth were also considerably more likely to have affiliated loved ones members (73.1 vs. 33.3 , pG0.01; data not shown). Close Friend Qualities by Gang Affiliation. In comparison to non-affiliated youth, gang-affiliated youth have been additional likely to report that their close mates lived in their neighborhood (75.6 vs. 51.two , p=0.01; Table 2). There had been no significant differences between gang-affiliated and non-affiliated youth with respect to getting close pals in college, presently enrolled within a 2-year or 4-year college or vocational instruction plan. In addition, about 90 of both groups title= jir.2012.0140 reported getting at the least some close close friends who aspired to visit a 4-year college. Compared to non-affiliated youth, gang-affiliated youth were far more most likely to have truant close good friends (71.eight vs. 44.1 , pG0.01), have close mates that have spent a night in juvenile detention or prison (73.1 vs. 28.six , pG0.01), and have close close friends that have been or gotten a person pregnant (56.4 vs. 22.6 , pG0.01). Associations in between Close Pal Characteristics and Frequent Substance Use. Across the 72 peer networks enrolled in Yo Puedo, the only significantTABLE 1 Gang-affiliated N=78 N ( ) 17.2 35 (44.87) 71 (91.03) 26 (33.33) 63 (80.77) 39 (50.00) 42 (53.85) 25 (32.05) 50 (64.10) 66 (84.62) 27 (34.62) 7 (eight.97) 21 (26.92) 49 (62.82) 37 (47.44) three (3.85) 13 (16.67) 17 (21.79) 64 (82.05) 14.36 80 (95.24) 11 (three.10) 7 (8.33) 19 (22.62) 58 (69.05) 47 (55.95) 1 (1.19) 11 (13.ten) 16 (19.05) 54 (64.29) 14.Ons assessed across the whole sample persisted when title= brb3.242 examining only gang-affiliated youth. We also examined the models for gang-affiliated youth stratified by gender. We identified no differences in the relationships among our major exposures and substance use outcomes comparing males and females. Therefore, we chose to present combined outcomes and adjust for gender to address any modest confounding.Benefits Participant Qualities by Gang Affiliation. In the 162 youth enrolled in Yo Puedo, almost half (48.1 ) was gang-affiliated (Table 1). When compared with nonaffiliated youth, gang-affiliated youth had been slightly older (imply age, 17.2 vs. 16.six years; p=0.01) and more most likely to be living inside a house exactly where a family members member was getting social service rewards (64.1 vs. 50.0 , p=0.02). Although there have been no considerable variations by gender, nativity, or other sociodemographic measures, distributions suggest gang-affiliated youth to become far more heavily represented for practically just about every proxy of low socioeconomic status.