Відмінності між версіями «PFC (5 cm anterior to M1 or M2)0.6 Hz 1 single train 540 pulses»

Поточна версія на 15:46, 10 грудня 2017

Emotional GDC-0032 Stroop activity with neutral and angry faces (t10) two. AB assessment job with neutral and threatening words (t0, t1)20 (six)19.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience | www.frontiersin.orgOctober 2015 | Volume 9 | ArticleMondino et al.NIBS effects on mood and emotionTABLE 1 | Continued References Study design N (Males) Mean age in years 20.6 Web site of stimulation* NIBS parameters** Experimental outcomes (Time of assessment) Principal results"Attend threat" ABM + sham tDCS "Avoid threat" ABM + sham tDCS Feeser et al., 2014 Parallel sham controlled tDCS applied for the duration of emotional regulation (4 conditions: preserve neutral feelings, downregulate, upregulate, or sustain negative emotions)22 (7)18 (eight)19.42 (20)28.R DLFPC/L supraorbital region (10/20 EEG)1.5 mA 20 min Anodal: 35 cm2 Cathodal: 100 cm1. Arousal ratings on IAPS pictures (t0.five) two. Skin conductance response (t0.five) three. Gaze fixation (t0.five) four. Multidimensional State Questionnaire (t0, t1)Active vs. Sham tDCS: 1. Arousal ratings: Reduced inside the downregulation conditions. Greater and within the adverse retain inside the upregulation situation 2. Skin conductance: Reduced response within the downregulation condition. Larger response inside the upregulation condition three. Gaze fixation: No impact 4. Multidimensional State Questionnaire: No effect* Website of stimulation is offered as follows, for rTMS: coil position, for tDCS: anode/cathode position. The process applied to define the target is supplied as follows, (10/20 EEG), Electrode placements as outlined by 10/20 EEG method; (MRI BN), Magnetic Resonance GDC-0810 web Imaging based neuronavigation. ** NIBS parameters are offered as follows, for rTMS: frequency, trains quantity and duration, ITI, variety of pulses, intensity, for tDCS: intensity, duration, electrode size. AB, Attentional bias; ABM, Attentional bias modification activity; ACC, Anterior cingulate cortex; AGN, Affective go-no-go; AIT, Arithmetic inhibition activity; BDI, Beck depression inventory; BISBAS, Behavioral inhibition system and behavioral strategy technique; Cz, Central midline; DLPFC, Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; DWM, Delayed response functioning memory task; IAPS, International affective picture program; ITI, Intertrain interval; L, Left; M1, Left key motor cortex; M2, Proper main motor cortex; MT, Motor threshold; N, number of subjects; NAP, Unfavorable affective priming; NIBS, Non-invasive brain stimulation; NIMH, National institute of mental overall health; OFC, Orbitofrontal cortex; O1, Left occipital cortex; O2, Right occipital cortex; PANAS, Good affect and unfavorable influence schedule; PASAT.PFC (5 cm anterior to M1 or M2)0.six Hz 1 single train 540 pulses 130 MT1. Emotional Stroop activity with neutral and angry faces (t10) two. POMS-32 (t0, t1)tDCS studies Wolkenstein et al., 2014 Crossover Sham controlled 28 (8) 30.9 R deltoid/L DLPFC (10/20 EEG) 1 mA 20 min 35 cm2 1. DWM (t0.five) 2. AIT with good, neutral and adverse photos (t1) three. PANAS (t0, t1) Active vs. sham tDCS: 1. DWM: Reduced accuracy for damaging vs. neutral and positive images two. AIT: Longer RT for adverse vs. neutral and positive photographs 3. title= title= 1471-2474-14-48 target='resource_window'>fpsyg.2016.01448 PANAS: No impact "Attend threat" ABM combined with active tDCS vs. "attend threat" ABM combined with sham tDCS: 1. AB assessment task: Increased AB to threat "Avoid threat" ABM combined with active tDCS vs. "Avoid threat" combined with sham tDCS: 1. AB assessment task: Decreased AB to threat (Continued)Clarke et al.,Parallel Sham controlled "Attend threat" ABM + active tDCS "Avoid threat" ABM + active tDCS17 (7)19.L DLPFC/L superior trapezius (10/20 EEG)1 mA mean 17 min 24 cm1.