Відмінності між версіями «PFC (5 cm anterior to M1 or M2)0.six Hz 1 single train 540 pulses»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
м
м
 
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
AB assessment job with neutral and threatening words (t0, t1)20 (6)19.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience | www.frontiersin.orgOctober 2015 | [http://nevawipe.com/members/arrow32makeup/activity/237250/ , 2012). Therefore, provided the part of miRNAs as potential regulators of neurogenesis] Volume 9 | [http://collaborate.karivass.com/members/start88flock/activity/896702/ Of depression-like symptoms, suggesting that a prior inflammation may set the] ArticleMondino et al.NIBS effects on mood and emotionTABLE 1 | Continued References Study style N (Males) Imply age in years 20.six Web site of stimulation* NIBS parameters** Experimental outcomes (Time of assessment) Major results"Attend threat" ABM + sham tDCS "Avoid threat" ABM + sham tDCS Feeser et al., 2014 Parallel sham controlled tDCS applied through emotional regulation (4 situations: preserve neutral feelings, downregulate, upregulate, or maintain damaging emotions)22 (7)18 (8)19.42 (20)28.R DLFPC/L supraorbital region (10/20 EEG)1.five mA 20 min Anodal: 35 cm2 Cathodal: 100 cm1. The system utilized to define the target is provided as follows, (10/20 EEG), Electrode placements in accordance with 10/20 EEG method; (MRI BN), Magnetic Resonance Imaging based neuronavigation. ** NIBS parameters are provided as follows, for rTMS: frequency, trains quantity and duration, ITI, number of pulses, intensity, for tDCS: intensity, duration, electrode size. AB, Attentional bias; ABM, Attentional bias modification process; ACC, Anterior cingulate cortex; AGN, Affective go-no-go; AIT, Arithmetic inhibition process; BDI, Beck depression inventory; BISBAS, Behavioral inhibition program and behavioral approach program; Cz, Central midline; DLPFC, Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; DWM, Delayed response operating memory job; IAPS, International affective image technique; ITI, Intertrain interval; L, Left; M1, Left major motor cortex; M2, Proper main motor cortex; MT, Motor threshold; N, number of subjects; NAP, Damaging affective priming; NIBS, Non-invasive brain stimulation; NIMH, National institute of mental overall health; OFC, Orbitofrontal cortex; O1, Left occipital cortex; O2, Right occipital cortex; PANAS, Optimistic affect and damaging affect schedule; PASAT.PFC (5 cm anterior to M1 or M2)0.six Hz 1 single train 540 pulses 130  MT1. Emotional Stroop process with neutral and angry faces (t10) 2. POMS-32 (t0, t1)tDCS studies Wolkenstein et al., 2014 Crossover Sham controlled 28 (eight) 30.9 R deltoid/L DLPFC (10/20 EEG) 1 mA 20 min 35 cm2 1. DWM (t0.5) 2. AIT with optimistic, neutral and damaging images (t1) 3. PANAS (t0, t1) Active vs. sham tDCS: 1. DWM: Reduced accuracy for damaging vs. neutral and optimistic images 2. AIT: Longer RT for adverse vs. neutral and good images 3. [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01448 title= ][https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-48 title= 1471-2474-14-48] target='resource_window'>fpsyg.2016.01448 PANAS: No effect "Attend threat" ABM combined with active tDCS vs. "attend threat" ABM combined with sham tDCS: 1. AB assessment process: Enhanced AB to threat "Avoid threat" ABM combined with active tDCS vs. "Avoid threat" combined with sham tDCS: 1. AB assessment activity: Decreased AB to threat (Continued)Clarke et al.,Parallel Sham controlled "Attend threat" ABM + active tDCS "Avoid threat" ABM + active tDCS17 (7)19.L DLPFC/L superior trapezius (10/20 EEG)1 mA mean 17 min 24 cm1. AB assessment job with neutral and threatening words (t0, t1)20 (6)19.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience | www.frontiersin.orgOctober 2015 | Volume 9 | ArticleMondino et al.NIBS effects on mood and emotionTABLE 1 | Continued References Study design N (Males) Mean age in years 20.6 Web page of stimulation* NIBS parameters** Experimental outcomes (Time of assessment) Main results"Attend threat" ABM + sham tDCS "Avoid threat" ABM + sham tDCS Feeser et al., 2014 Parallel sham controlled tDCS applied for the duration of emotional regulation (4 situations: maintain neutral emotions, downregulate, upregulate, or preserve negative feelings)22 (7)18 (8)19.42 (20)28.R DLFPC/L supraorbital area (10/20 EEG)1.5 mA 20 min Anodal: 35 cm2 Cathodal: 100 cm1.
+
PANAS (t0, t1) Active vs. sham tDCS: 1. DWM: Reduced accuracy for adverse vs. neutral and positive photographs two. AIT: Longer RT for unfavorable vs. neutral and good pictures three. [https://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01448 title= ][https://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-14-48 title= 1471-2474-14-48] target='resource_window'>fpsyg.2016.01448 PANAS: No impact "Attend threat" ABM combined with active tDCS vs. "attend threat" ABM combined with sham tDCS: 1. AB assessment process: Improved AB to threat "Avoid threat" ABM combined with active tDCS vs. "Avoid threat" combined with sham tDCS: 1. AB assessment process: Decreased AB to threat (Continued)[http://besocietal.com/members/jurycomic78/activity/284002/ Creased in the hippocampus of male Sprague Dawley rats after tail] Clarke et al.,Parallel Sham controlled "Attend threat" ABM + active tDCS "Avoid threat" ABM + active tDCS17 (7)19.L DLPFC/L superior trapezius (10/20 EEG)1 mA imply 17 min 24 cm1. AB assessment job with neutral and threatening words (t0, t1)20 (six)19.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience | www.frontiersin.orgOctober 2015 | Volume 9 | ArticleMondino et al.NIBS effects on mood and emotionTABLE 1 | Continued References Study design N (Males) Imply age in years 20.6 Web-site of stimulation* NIBS parameters** Experimental outcomes (Time of assessment) Key results"Attend threat" ABM + sham tDCS "Avoid threat" ABM + sham tDCS Feeser et al., 2014 Parallel sham controlled tDCS applied for the duration of emotional regulation (four conditions: keep neutral emotions, downregulate, upregulate, or retain adverse feelings)22 (7)18 (8)19.42 (20)28.R DLFPC/L supraorbital area (10/20 EEG)1.five mA 20 min Anodal: 35 cm2 Cathodal: one hundred cm1. Arousal ratings on IAPS pictures (t0.five) two. Skin conductance response (t0.five) 3. Gaze fixation (t0.five) 4. Multidimensional State Questionnaire (t0, t1)Active vs. Sham tDCS: 1. Arousal ratings: Reduced inside the downregulation circumstances. Larger and within the damaging maintain inside the upregulation situation two. Skin conductance: Lower response inside the downregulation condition. Larger response in the upregulation condition 3. Gaze fixation: No impact four. Multidimensional State Questionnaire: No effect* Web page of stimulation is provided as follows, for rTMS: coil position, for tDCS: anode/cathode position. The approach utilised to define the target is offered as follows, (10/20 EEG), Electrode placements in line with 10/20 EEG system; (MRI BN), Magnetic Resonance Imaging based neuronavigation. ** NIBS parameters are offered as follows, for rTMS: frequency, trains number and duration, ITI, quantity of pulses, intensity, for tDCS: intensity, duration, electrode size. AB, Attentional bias; ABM, Attentional bias modification job; ACC, Anterior cingulate cortex; AGN, Affective go-no-go; AIT, Arithmetic inhibition job; BDI, Beck depression inventory; BISBAS, Behavioral inhibition technique and behavioral approach system; Cz, Central midline; DLPFC, Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; DWM, Delayed response working memory task; IAPS, International affective image program; ITI, Intertrain interval; L, Left; M1, Left key motor cortex; M2, Proper principal motor cortex; MT, Motor threshold; N, variety of subjects; NAP, Adverse affective priming; NIBS, Non-invasive brain stimulation; NIMH, National [http://besocietal.com/members/side72hedge/activity/315797/ CNS into quinolinic acid, a neurotoxic compound (Dantzer and Walker, 2014). Astrocytes] institute of mental health; OFC, Orbitofrontal cortex; O1, Left occipital cortex; O2, Right occipital cortex; PANAS, Constructive impact and damaging have an effect on schedule; PASAT.PFC (five cm anterior to M1 or M2)0.6 Hz 1 single train 540 pulses 130  MT1. Emotional Stroop process with neutral and angry faces (t10) two. POMS-32 (t0, t1)tDCS studies Wolkenstein et al., 2014 Crossover Sham controlled 28 (8) 30.9 R deltoid/L DLPFC (10/20 EEG) 1 mA 20 min 35 cm2 1.

Поточна версія на 20:37, 7 грудня 2017

PANAS (t0, t1) Active vs. sham tDCS: 1. DWM: Reduced accuracy for adverse vs. neutral and positive photographs two. AIT: Longer RT for unfavorable vs. neutral and good pictures three. title= title= 1471-2474-14-48 target='resource_window'>fpsyg.2016.01448 PANAS: No impact "Attend threat" ABM combined with active tDCS vs. "attend threat" ABM combined with sham tDCS: 1. AB assessment process: Improved AB to threat "Avoid threat" ABM combined with active tDCS vs. "Avoid threat" combined with sham tDCS: 1. AB assessment process: Decreased AB to threat (Continued)Creased in the hippocampus of male Sprague Dawley rats after tail Clarke et al.,Parallel Sham controlled "Attend threat" ABM + active tDCS "Avoid threat" ABM + active tDCS17 (7)19.L DLPFC/L superior trapezius (10/20 EEG)1 mA imply 17 min 24 cm1. AB assessment job with neutral and threatening words (t0, t1)20 (six)19.Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience | www.frontiersin.orgOctober 2015 | Volume 9 | ArticleMondino et al.NIBS effects on mood and emotionTABLE 1 | Continued References Study design N (Males) Imply age in years 20.6 Web-site of stimulation* NIBS parameters** Experimental outcomes (Time of assessment) Key results"Attend threat" ABM + sham tDCS "Avoid threat" ABM + sham tDCS Feeser et al., 2014 Parallel sham controlled tDCS applied for the duration of emotional regulation (four conditions: keep neutral emotions, downregulate, upregulate, or retain adverse feelings)22 (7)18 (8)19.42 (20)28.R DLFPC/L supraorbital area (10/20 EEG)1.five mA 20 min Anodal: 35 cm2 Cathodal: one hundred cm1. Arousal ratings on IAPS pictures (t0.five) two. Skin conductance response (t0.five) 3. Gaze fixation (t0.five) 4. Multidimensional State Questionnaire (t0, t1)Active vs. Sham tDCS: 1. Arousal ratings: Reduced inside the downregulation circumstances. Larger and within the damaging maintain inside the upregulation situation two. Skin conductance: Lower response inside the downregulation condition. Larger response in the upregulation condition 3. Gaze fixation: No impact four. Multidimensional State Questionnaire: No effect* Web page of stimulation is provided as follows, for rTMS: coil position, for tDCS: anode/cathode position. The approach utilised to define the target is offered as follows, (10/20 EEG), Electrode placements in line with 10/20 EEG system; (MRI BN), Magnetic Resonance Imaging based neuronavigation. ** NIBS parameters are offered as follows, for rTMS: frequency, trains number and duration, ITI, quantity of pulses, intensity, for tDCS: intensity, duration, electrode size. AB, Attentional bias; ABM, Attentional bias modification job; ACC, Anterior cingulate cortex; AGN, Affective go-no-go; AIT, Arithmetic inhibition job; BDI, Beck depression inventory; BISBAS, Behavioral inhibition technique and behavioral approach system; Cz, Central midline; DLPFC, Dorsolateral prefrontal cortex; DWM, Delayed response working memory task; IAPS, International affective image program; ITI, Intertrain interval; L, Left; M1, Left key motor cortex; M2, Proper principal motor cortex; MT, Motor threshold; N, variety of subjects; NAP, Adverse affective priming; NIBS, Non-invasive brain stimulation; NIMH, National CNS into quinolinic acid, a neurotoxic compound (Dantzer and Walker, 2014). Astrocytes institute of mental health; OFC, Orbitofrontal cortex; O1, Left occipital cortex; O2, Right occipital cortex; PANAS, Constructive impact and damaging have an effect on schedule; PASAT.PFC (five cm anterior to M1 or M2)0.6 Hz 1 single train 540 pulses 130 MT1. Emotional Stroop process with neutral and angry faces (t10) two. POMS-32 (t0, t1)tDCS studies Wolkenstein et al., 2014 Crossover Sham controlled 28 (8) 30.9 R deltoid/L DLPFC (10/20 EEG) 1 mA 20 min 35 cm2 1.