Purge U0126 Pains Completely

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 17:45, 22 червня 2017, створена Bronzeedge83 (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: , 1996) as effects of no interest. Temporal autocorrelations were modeled by a first order autoregressive model. Voxels activated by the breath-holding challeng...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

, 1996) as effects of no interest. Temporal autocorrelations were modeled by a first order autoregressive model. Voxels activated by the breath-holding challenge were determined by testing for significant positive correlation of the measured signal with the modeled response. T statistics were estimated for each voxel and activations passing a fixed voxel-wise threshold of t?>?3.11 were considered significant (p?crotamiton and FH-based shim sessions. Voxels showing a significant increase for the BS-based shim sessions compared to the FH-based shim sessions were determined using T statistics (p?U0126 volume effects, all maps (including statistical maps from the EPI time series analysis) were masked using a gray matter mask generated from Wnt inhibitor review the T1-weighted images. In contrast to FH-based shimming, the BS-based procedure is influenced by the selected EPI acquisition parameters. Therefore, to explore a larger range of factors affecting the optimization and to demonstrate the general applicability of the technique, we performed simulations to assess the effect of varying the regularization constraints for different sets of EPI acquisition parameters and for ROIs defined in other regions of the brain (in particular in the left and right orbitofrontal cortices characterized by a unipolar GRO gradient field, unlike the medial orbitofrontal cortex). The optimization was performed on real data acquired on subject #1, using Eqs. (1) to (3). The results of the simulations were analyzed in terms of predicted field homogeneity (including GPE, GRO, and GSS), BOLD sensitivity and effective TE. The standard EPI parameters were compared with alternative values for the nominal echo time (TC), echo spacing (��t), field of view (FoV) and slice thickness (��z). The behavior of the BS-based shimming was assessed by calculating the change in shim currents with respect to those obtained with the FH-based procedure.