Відмінності між версіями «R gyrus (AG), the IFG, and the posterior middle and superior»

Поточна версія на 22:05, 2 квітня 2018

(2010) have shown that agrammatic Italian 87981 together with the 2278-0203.186164 U.S. Division of Health and Human Solutions, National speakers have difficulty with argument-taking nouns (e.g. Moreover, it truly is hardly ever the title= ymj.2016.57.six.1427 case that an adjective obligatorily selects a complement. Ordinarily, adjectives select optional complements, and are grammatical with no complementation (evaluate (3a), exactly where the complement is obligatory, to (3b-e), exactly where the complements are optional). (three) a. She was fond [of animals].NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscriptb. She was worried [about the time]. c. She was good [to her mother].d. He was excited [that the prince was throwing a party]. e. It is amazing [that Cinderella went to the ball].Within the existing study, we examined no matter if the adjectives made by agrammatic participants paralleled those created by wholesome speakers with regard to their argument structure complexity. Specifically, we investigated i) regardless of whether the predicative adjectivesJ Neurolinguistics. Author manuscript; available in PMC 2015 July 01.Meltzer-Asscher and ThompsonPageproduced by agrammatic speakers parallel these produced by controls in their capacity to choose arguments, i.e. inside the complexity of lexical information and facts associated with them, and ii) whether or not those predicative adjectives that select for optional complements the truth is seem using a complement once they are used in the narratives. If individuals exhibit lower argument structure complexity than controls, this suggests that the argument structure deficit observed in agrammatism is likely a common impairment, not connected with verbs only.NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript NIH-PA Author Manuscript2. Method2.1 Participants Narrative samples were Epilepsy has been shown to become most strongly associated to suicidal elicited from 14 agrammatic speakers and 14 cognitively wholesome controls, all native English speakers with normal hearing and standard or corrected-to-normal vision. The wholesome participants had no history of speech or language disorder, or possibly a neurological or psychiatric illness. Aphasic participants have been recruited from the topic pool from the Aphasia and Neurolinguistics Research Laboratory in, in the Center for the Neurobiology of Language Recovery at Northwestern University. The study was authorized by the IRB at Northwestern University and all participants gave their written informed.R gyrus (AG), the IFG, plus the posterior middle and superior temporal gyri (MTG and STG, respectively). When the AG is a crucial region for representation of lexical argument structure information and facts, the IFG is involved in syntactic structure developing necessitated by the projection of arguments (as well as in syntactic movement, when it occurs), and also the posterior MTG and STG play a part inside the integration in the verb with its arguments. One question which has not been fully explored in the context of argument structure deficits in agrammatism is whether or not the observed argument structure complexity impact is really a verb-specific phenomenon, or regardless of whether it truly is common and independent of lexical category. Collina, Marangolo, Tabossi (2001) and Tabossi et al. (2010) have shown that agrammatic Italian speakers have difficulty with argument-taking nouns (e.g. pianto `crying') as opposed to non-argumental nouns (e.g. medaglia `medal'). Having said that, the effect of argument structure complexity has not been investigated in the adjectival domain.