Rare Article Content Uncovers The Deceiving Solutions Linked With Otenabant

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 06:37, 8 червня 2017, створена Bumper0hook (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: Face validity was determined by expert opinion. Three experts participated in and agreed on the validity of the possible FAIM questions. FAIM questions were con...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

Face validity was determined by expert opinion. Three experts participated in and agreed on the validity of the possible FAIM questions. FAIM questions were considered valid if they addressed aspects of food allergy outcomes that patients were likely to perceive as determining the severity of their condition. Questions showing no correlation to any potential FAQLQ item were not considered relevant and therefore eliminated. Dutch children (8�C12?years), adolescents (13�C17?years) and adults (��18?years) with food allergy were recruited from our clinic or by advertisement from January 2007 to May 2007. Patients with the most prevalent food allergies were included. The FAIMs were sent by mail to be completed at home. Participation was completely voluntary. Regarding the FAIM-CF, parents Otenabant were instructed that they were allowed to explain a question when needed, but they were not allowed to tell the child which answer to give. All patients who Ribociclib cost completed the first questionnaires (test) received the second questionnaires (re-test) 10�C14?days after completion of the first. Patients who did not respond within 14?days were excluded from the study as well as patients who reported a clinically important change in health state [defined as a food allergic reaction of grade 3 or 4 according to the Mueller classification (7)] between the measurements or within two months before the study. This study ran in parallel with the test-retest reliability study of the FAQLQs (8). The study was approved by the local medical ethics review commission (METc 2005/051). Data were analysed using spss software for Windows (Version 14.0). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), using a one-way anova (9) and Lin��s concordance correlation coefficient (CCC) (10), were calculated to investigate test-retest reliability. ICCs and CCCs should be above 0.7 for group comparison studies buy MI-773 (11). P-values