Відмінності між версіями «Shed by Veronique Boudon-Millot in `Un trait?perdu de Galien miraculeusement»

Версія за 10:00, 30 березня 2018

Additional emendations on corrupted passages happen to be suggested by Ivan Garofalo, `Congetture inedite', Galenos, 2 (2008), 137?; Ioannis Polemis, ` , , 43 (2011), 1?; Antonio Stramaglia, `Libri perduti per sempre: Galeno, "De indolentia" 13; 16; 17?9', Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica, 139 (2011), 118?7; Anargyros ACT-334441 price Anastassiou, `Galen, de Ganoderic acid A chemical information indolentia, ?1, S. The references I give to the Greek text are mostly based on the edition of P. Kotzia and P. Soteroudis from the identical year, P. Kotzia and P. Sotiroudis (eds), ` ', , 60 (2010), 63?48 (henceforth KS), with cross-references for the BJP edition for the reader's convenience (note that the two edns present distinct chapter division and lining). It's striking that the text of Kotzia and Sotiroudis (otherwise conveniently obtainable in all important libraries) has been neglected by modern day scholars, regardless of the fact that they had been the only editors who had autopsy of the manuscript in preparing their edition. This assisted them on palaeographical grounds to reconstruct corrupted words title= en.2011-1044 which the other editors have not been capable to identify with certainty. For example, in ?, 68, 49 KS = ?1, 5, eight BJP, Kotzia and Sotiroudes study ?at the beginning of your word, and ?in the finish of it, and therefore supplemented three missing letters within the middle ��, suggesting [], whereas the French editors only study ?because the initial letter of a word, suggesting [ ]. Similarly, ?, 68, 51 KS recommend [ ], but ?1, 5, 10 BJP can not possibly supplement the word, considering the fact that a beginning epsilon (? is definitely the only letter they will read. More causes that led me to choose the KS edn is their wealthy apparatus of parallel passages in contrast for the meagre one particular of BJP, and their detailed commentary, which offers in depth remarks on philological, philosophical and healthcare matters arising from the text. Further emendations on corrupted passages have been recommended by Ivan Garofalo, `Congetture inedite', Galenos, two (2008), 137?; Ioannis Polemis, ` , , 43 (2011), 1?; Antonio Stramaglia, `Libri perduti per sempre: Galeno, "De indolentia" 13; 16; 17?9', Rivista di Filologia e di Istruzione Classica, 139 (2011), 118?7; Anargyros Anastassiou, `Galen, de indolentia, ?1, S. 21, 17?9 Boudon-Millot, Jouanna = ?7, S. 79, 321?22 Kotzia, Sotiroudis = ?1, S. 44 Garofalo, Lami, S.', Galenos, six (2012), 49?1; Ivan Garofalo and Alessandro Lami, Galeno: l'anima e il dolore: de indolentia, de propriis placitis (Milan: BUR, 2012), 149?five. The translations of Avoiding Distress cited throughout are mine; the translations of Galen's other ethical functions are appropriated versions from the translations contained in Peter Singer (ed.), Galen: Psychological Writings: Avoiding Distress, Character Traits, The Diagnosis and Remedy on the Affections and Errors Peculiar to Each and every Person's Soul, The Capacities of the Soul rely on the Mixtures on the Physique (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014). Inside the identical title= ten.tea.2011.0131 volume there is certainly a new English translation of Avoiding Distress by V. Nutton, 77?9.Sophia Xenophontosvaluable info in regards to the production and publication of ancient books, plus the holdings of Imperial libraries;8 it elucidates elements of Galen's life which we can crosscheck against the unreliability of his Arabic biographies;9 ultimately, it a.