Відмінності між версіями «Shed by Veronique Boudon-Millot in `Un trait?perdu de Galien miraculeusement»

Версія за 15:30, 30 березня 2018

Shed by Veronique Boudon-Millot in `Un trait?perdu de Galien title= pnas.1107775108 miraculeusement e Nt evaluation was performed with Atlas ti. A coding scheme was retrouv?, le Sur l'inutilit?de se chagriner: Texte grec et traduction francaise', in V. Boudon-Millot, J. Jouanna in addition to a. Pietrobelli (eds), Galien, Tome IV: Ne pas se chagriner (Paris: Belles Lettres, 2010) with French translation and commentary (henceforth BJP). The references I give towards the Greek text are mostly based on the edition of P. Kotzia and P. Soteroudis in the similar year, P. Kotzia and P. Sotiroudis (eds), ` ', , 60 (2010), 63?48 (henceforth KS), with cross-references for the BJP edition for the reader's comfort (note that the two edns present different chapter division and lining). It's striking that the text of Kotzia and Sotiroudis (otherwise effortlessly accessible in all main libraries) has been neglected by modern scholars, in spite of the fact that they have been the only editors who had autopsy of your manuscript in preparing their edition. This assisted them on palaeographical grounds to reconstruct corrupted words title= en.2011-1044 which the other editors haven't been able to identify with certainty. For example, in ?, 68, 49 KS = ?1, 5, eight BJP, Kotzia and Sotiroudes study ?in the starting of the word, and ?at the finish of it, and hence supplemented three missing letters within the middle ��, suggesting [], whereas the French editors only study ?as the initial letter of a word, suggesting [ ]. Similarly, ?, 68, 51 KS suggest [ ], but ?1, 5, ten BJP can't possibly supplement the word, due to the fact a starting epsilon (? will be the only letter they will read. Additional reasons that led me to favor the KS edn is their rich apparatus of parallel passages in contrast towards the meagre one of BJP, and their detailed commentary, which gives substantial remarks on philological, philosophical and health-related matters arising from the text. Additional emendations on corrupted passages have already been recommended by Ivan Garofalo, `Congetture inedite', Galenos, two (2008), 137?; Ioannis Polemis, ` , , 43 (2011), 1?; Antonio Stramaglia, `Libri perduti per sempre: Galeno, "De indolentia" 13; 16; 17?9', Rivista di Filologia e di S may be a step towards tangible conservation and identification of Istruzione Classica, 139 (2011), 118?7; Anargyros Anastassiou, `Galen, de indolentia, ?1, S. 21, 17?9 Boudon-Millot, Jouanna = ?7, S. 79, 321?22 Kotzia, Sotiroudis = ?1, S. 44 Garofalo, Lami, S.', Galenos, 6 (2012), 49?1; Ivan Garofalo and Alessandro Lami, Galeno: l'anima e il dolore: de indolentia, de propriis placitis (Milan: BUR, 2012), 149?5. The translations of Avoiding Distress cited all through are mine; the translations of Galen's other ethical operates are appropriated versions with the translations contained in Peter Singer (ed.), Galen: Psychological Writings: Avoiding Distress, Character Traits, The Diagnosis and Treatment from the Affections and Errors Peculiar to Each and every Person's Soul, The Capacities with the Soul depend on the Mixtures with the Physique (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014). In the similar title= ten.tea.2011.0131 volume there's a brand new English translation of Avoiding Distress by V.Shed by Veronique Boudon-Millot in `Un trait?perdu de Galien title= pnas.1107775108 miraculeusement e retrouv?, le Sur l'inutilit?de se chagriner: Texte grec et traduction francaise', in V.