So, Who Else Is Actually Lying To Us Regarding SERCA?

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

Table 3 % means and standard deviations of CFU/mg dry weight in the biofilms grown according to the treatments. Biofilms formed on MH or MHS medium presented lower values of the biomass (viable microorganisms/mg dry weight) than UTYEB (p check details lower than 0.012% CHX group and this was lower than 0.001% CHX group. The group treated with 0.0001% CHX and baselines 48?h and 120?h presented higher values than the others (p Luminespib purchase higher pH than others (Figure 7). 4. Discussion The polymicrobial community of dental biofilm is one of the best-studied kinds of biofilms. When it comes to oral biofilm, more than 500 species or phylotypes have been identified [26]. Dental biofilm is challenged by frequent changes in environmental conditions, for example, food intake, temperature, pH change, and salivary flow. Perhaps as a response to environmental challenges, the oral biofilm community has evolved with individual members assuming specialized functions, for example, primary and secondary colonizers [27], including members SERCA that can metabolize excreted products (such as lactic acid) produced by other species [28]. It is challenging to control diseases caused by biofilms due to the difficulty in finding substances able to interfere with factors involved with bacterial organization in a biofilm, as well as the antibacterial properties of the biofilm structure itself [29]. Antiplaque agents are designed to (a) prevent the formation of the biofilm and/or (b) remove established biofilm. In contrast, the mode of action of antimicrobial agents involves inhibiting the growth or killing the target bacteria, expressed in terms of their MIC or MBC, respectively [30]. There are currently a variety of model systems available that could be applied for studying the process of human dental caries, each of these showing advantages and disadvantages. An in vitro model system using bacterial biofilms is likely to display less inherent variability than an in situ model system, since variables such as fluid (saliva) flow, carbohydrate intake, and bacterial population composition can be controlled more accurately in vitro [31]. The model of S. mutans biofilm growth tested in this study, described by Koo et al.