The 4 MostOver The Top Parvulin Tricks... And Approaches To Utilise Them!

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

We defined statistical significance as p?BEZ235 CIP and SXT, the proportion of non-susceptible isolates was highest when the AST interpretations reported by the laboratories were used (Table?3). For all four AST interpretation methods, there was no increase in the proportion of isolates non-susceptible to AMO and SXT over time, while the proportion of isolates non-susceptible to CFX, CAZ, GEN and CIP increased significantly since January 2008 (Table?3). For AMC the proportion of non-susceptible isolates showed a significant increase from 22.2% in 2008 to 25.8% in 2011 for the AST results reported by the laboratories. However, there was no increase in AMC non-susceptibility when MICs were reinterpreted according to the EUCAST and CLSI breakpoints Parvulin (19.8% in 2008 and 19.3% in 2011). For CRO/CTX there was a significant increase in non-susceptibility over time when analysing AST interpretations according to the laboratories and VE-821 price EUCAST 2010 breakpoints, and when switching in 2010 from CLSI 2009 to EUCAST 2010 breakpoints, while there was no increase when analysing AST interpretations according to CLSI 2009 breakpoints (Table?3). To evaluate the effect of the application of a specific guideline (i.e. CLSI or EUCAST) on antimicrobial resistance trends, we determined the proportion of isolates differently interpreted for each antimicrobial agent by EUCAST 2010 and CLSI 2009 breakpoints as described in the methods section. This analysis showed a significant increase over time in the proportion of isolates that were interpreted as non-susceptible to CAZ and CRO/CTX with EUCAST breakpoints, but that were interpreted as susceptible with CLSI breakpoints. This finding suggests a larger rise in non-susceptibility to the oxymino-cephalosporins when the EUCAST breakpoints are used. Furthermore, to assess the impact of a guideline change on resistance trends, we determined the proportion of isolates differently interpreted by the simulated guideline switch and the AST results of the laboratories.