The Amazing Tofacitinib Trick That Could Fool All

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 18:41, 16 червня 2017, створена Burst58alto (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: 57 times as likely to have developed radiation dermatitis compared with patients belonging to the control group. This is a significant difference (P [http://www...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

57 times as likely to have developed radiation dermatitis compared with patients belonging to the control group. This is a significant difference (P selleck chemicals in the control group. However, the most relevant questions for patients receiving R1 and R2 treatment related to skin dryness, stinging, and desquamation for patients with breast cancer and the reduced use of medication for pain control in patients with SCCHN. Summary of findings These findings have shown that treatment with R1 and R2 in patients receiving CRT for breast cancer and SCCHN had the following beneficial outcomes when compared with standard skin treatment (5% wt/wt urea lotion): R1 and R2 treatment prevented the development of acute radiation dermatitis in 25% of patients. R1 and R2 treatment delayed the onset of radiation dermatitis in 60% of patients. R1 and R2 treatment reduced the severity (CTC grade) of radiation dermatitis by 50% in those patients who developed it. R1 and R2 treatment improved the subjective tuclazepam assessment of patients�� QOL. DISCUSSION The majority of patients receiving radiation therapy will suffer from some degree of radiation dermatitis.1 As yet, there have been no published randomized, controlled, clinical trials to evaluate the most effective preventive treatments, and there is little evidence-based guidance available to radiotherapists, oncologists, dermatologists, and oncology nursing staff. We have presented the first comparative study of the use of R1 and R2 in a treated group and a nontreated group of patients receiving CRT. In this study, we evaluated the 2 groups of patients receiving radiotherapy who are most susceptible to severe radiation dermatitis: Protein Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor patients receiving treatment of SCCHN and patients receiving treatment of breast cancer. However, the study population was predominantly breast cancer patients (79/98; 80.6%) rather than patients with SCCHN. In future, larger studies, the surgical history of patients treated with CRT for breast cancer could be assessed in relation to radiation dermatitis, including any history of breast implants in breast reconstruction surgery. Postsurgical breast skin is susceptible to radiation toxicity, as is the skin overlying breast implants, possibly due to lack of dissipation of heat away from the breast.