The Care-Free Guy's Approach To The Gefitinib Triumph

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 08:04, 25 червня 2017, створена Iranchild1 (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: ?3A). A number of significant group differences for each behavioral state were found in several brain regions (Table?2). During gain anticipation in both groups...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

?3A). A number of significant group differences for each behavioral state were found in several brain regions (Table?2). During gain anticipation in both groups, the NA showed significant FC with the AMY, HIP, THAL, insula, BG, and cerebellum (Fig.?2B). Additionally, OCD patients showed a pattern of significantly increased FC of the NA with the posterior insula and occipital regions. Healthy controls had greater FC of the NA with the left AMY positioned adjacent to the AIS, middle frontal cortex, Histamine H2 receptor and midbrain. OCD patients had greater FC of the NA to the posterior insula, occipital cortex, and the cerebellum (Fig.?3B). During loss anticipation, the NA of healthy controls was functionally connected to brain regions similar to the FC map during gain anticipation, whereas OCD patients showed a set of regions that mostly did not overlap those of healthy controls, including the striatum, THAL, and cerebellum (Fig.?2C). Healthy controls had greater FC of the NA to the bilateral AMY positioned adjacent to the AIS, left mediodorsal THAL, middle temporal cortex, and the cerebellum, whereas OCD patients had greater FC of the NA to the occipital cortex (Fig.?3C). When comparing two groups on FC difference maps between resting-state Gefitinib cell line and loss anticipation, significant group differences were found in FC of the NA to the med-OFC and rostral ACC (Fig.?4). Networks that were negatively correlated with the NA were also assessed for both groups. During resting-state, only healthy controls exhibited a negative correlation between the NA and regions constituting the task-positive network (TPN; Fig.?2A; Fig. S2). Compared see more with controls, OCD patients showed increased FC in TPN regions (Fig. S2). There were no significant negative correlations with the NA for other conditions in either group. Voxel-wise linear regression analyses in SPM8 were performed to assess the extent to which patients' overall symptom severity (total Y-BOCS score) may be associated with the FC strength of the NA for each state. Correlations were considered significant if they exceeded p?