This Is The BMS-777607 Truths Your Mother And Father Does Not Want You To Know About

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 03:44, 19 листопада 2016, створена Curve2pocket (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: Rhesus rotavirus alone did [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/RVX_208 RVX-208] not show impressive protective efficacy in Finland [15] or the USA [16]. Subsequently...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

Rhesus rotavirus alone did RVX-208 not show impressive protective efficacy in Finland [15] or the USA [16]. Subsequently RRV backbone was reassorted with human rotavirus VP7 proteins representing the G-types G1, G2 and G4 [17]. As RRV represented G-type 3 (although rhesus) the combination was called ��tetravalent��, or RRV-TV vaccine. RRV-TV (later licensed as RotaShield?, Wyeth, Pearl River, NY, USA), given in three doses, proved to be highly efficacious against severe RVGE in the USA [18] and in Finland [19], and, was also quite efficacious in Venezuela [20]. The studies led to the licensure of RotaShield in the USA in 1998. The greater efficacy of RRV-TV compared with RRV has often been attributed to human G-type-specific immunity [18]. However, this explanation seems, for the most part, unlikely, because the neutralizing antibody responses to each of the G-types were generally low whereas the overall immune response rate after three doses of RRV-TV was close to 100% [21]. A more plausible explanation would be that RRV-TV, in contrast to monotypic RRV, will allow for different G-types to have a chance of ��taking�� up on each dosing, with a resulting selleck boost to overall immunity. The high overall uptake is measured by rotavirus serum IgA, in turn, antibody to VP6 group antigen using enzyme immunoassay, and a high level of rotavirus IgA is in good correlation with protective efficacy [22]. RotaShield was withdrawn in 1999, less than a year after licensure, because of association with intussusception. Intussusception was observed in prelicensure trials, but was not fully appreciated until about a million doses of the licensed vaccine had been given in the USA and about 100 cases had been seen. Typically, most of the cases of intussusception occurred 3�C7?days after dose 1, coinciding with the peak of virus multiplication and febrile reactions [23]. The majority of cases of intussusception occurred when the first dose of RRV-TV was administered to infants between 3 and 9?months of age as part of a ��catch-up�� programme launched in the USA. This age range is similar to the peak incidence of naturally occurring intussusception. In fact, the risk for Neratinib cell line intussusception after RotaShield in infants