Tracking down The Best Pictilisib Is Straightforward

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Версія від 21:06, 17 листопада 2016, створена Leek58pond (обговореннявнесок) (Створена сторінка: This measure is very similar to the more commonly used Cohen's d standardized mean difference effect size but includes a Bessel correction for variance estimati...)

(різн.) ← Попередня версія • Поточна версія (різн.) • Новіша версія → (різн.)
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

This measure is very similar to the more commonly used Cohen's d standardized mean difference effect size but includes a Bessel correction for variance estimation, which is more appropriate for small sample sizes. For each participant and electrode the VE-821 mean amplitude for the attended and unattended stimuli in the time window between 400 and 700?msec was computed and subjected to a repeated measures ANOVA comprising the factors electrodes (10 electrodes, i.e., six cap channels and four ear channels) and condition (attended, unattended). Significant effects were followed up with t-tests where appropriate. To estimate the relevance of individual time bins and individual channels irrespective of statistical significance, as commonly done in BCI feature evaluation (Blankertz et?al. 2011) single-subject point biserial correlation coefficients between target and nontarget trials were calculated (shown as unsigned R2). An equal number of target and nontarget trials was used for the analysis. Pictilisib chemical structure Specifically, we used 100 random sub samples of the nontarget trials and computed the R2 value with the target trials. Afterward the results of the 100 repetitions were averaged to obtain the mean R2 value. To compare our results to an earlier study we computed the information transfer rate (ITR). The ITR is a commonly used metric to evaluate and compare BCI performance over studies. It expresses the communication speed of a given system in bits of information that can be transmitted per minute. The ITR was computed as described in De Vos et?al. (2014b). The regular flashing of individual rows and columns generated a steady-state visual evoked response (SSVEP) at a frequency of 5.4054?Hz (185?msec inter flash interval). To estimate the strength of the SSVEP at ear and cap channels, we computed the log power of the SSVEP for all participants and channels. For each sequence of flashes, the signal was averaged in the time domain and the power was computed using the fast Fourier transform. For the frequency of interest (5.4054?Hz), a repeated measures one-way ANOVA was computed with electrodes as factor. A Greenhouse�CGeisser correction compensating for violations of sphericity was applied where appropriate. Results The ERPs at the classical recording sites Azastene PZ and CZ showed a clear SSVEP at around 5?Hz in response to the visual stimulation. In the time domain a clear P300 (400�C700?msec) component in response to target letters was evident. Over all electrodes, there was a significant effect between attended and unattended stimuli (F (1, 11)?=?34.85, P?