Відмінності між версіями «Ditions for Chinese and British. Vertical bars represent standard error. TABLE»

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук
(Створена сторінка: Pearson [http://ques2ans.gatentry.com/index.php?qa=61732&qa_1=de-info-to-infants-as-to-an-agents-subsequent-object-directed De data to infants as to an agent's...)
 
м
Рядок 1: Рядок 1:
−
Pearson [http://ques2ans.gatentry.com/index.php?qa=61732&qa_1=de-info-to-infants-as-to-an-agents-subsequent-object-directed De data to infants as to an agent's subsequent object-directed] skipped correlations gave similar results. Like previous studies, the standard tone in the current study was a unisensory stimulus in all conditions. The difference among conditions was what happened before the presentation of the tone. The `computer' condition functioned to exclude the alternative explanation that the predictability of the stimulus onset explained the conditional differences. Similar manipulations for the control condition have been reported before (e.g., Ford et al., 2007). Sensory attenuation for the self renders a 74 dB tone to be perceived about 0.4 dB (Sato, 2008) or 0.2 dB (Weiss et al., 2011) softer, which is a very small perceptual effect and may be difficult to be detected. This might be the reason why we can still find a significant correlation between SAself (but not SAother ) and delusional ideation, which also argues for the validity of the data.Ditions for Chinese and British. Vertical bars represent standard error. TABLE 1 | Summary of correlation analysis between SAself /SAother and four questionnaires scores using Pearson'scorrelation and Pearson bend correlation. Measure EQ SQ Independent SC Dependent SC PDI (overall) (British only) 0.37 [0.02, 0.67] 0.44 [0.02, 0.76] 0.20 [-0.23, 0.65] 0.15 [-0.28, 0.59]SAself(Method) Pearson Pearson bend-0.11 [-0.36, 0.14] -0.07 [-0.35, 0.20] 0.01 [-0.27, 0.30] 0.07 [-0.22, 0.38]0.01 [-0.26, 0.25] 0 [-0.28, 0.28] 0 [-0.28, 0.23] -0.04 [-0.33, 0.23]0.17 [-0.07, 0.40] 0.17 [-0.12, 0.43] 0.44 [0.21, 0.64] 0.40 [0.14, 0.65]0 [-0.26, 0.30] 0 [-0.29, 0.28] -0.02 [-0.31, 0.31] 0.06 [-0.23, 0.33]SAotherPearson Pearson bendData shown are Pearson's r values, and 95  confidence intervals are included in the brackets. Pearson skipped correlations gave similar results. Note that the p-value for the correlation between SAself and PDI overall is just above.05, but the bootstrapped 95  confidence interval is above 0 and Pearson bend correlation was significant. SAself , sensory attenuation for self-generated stimuli; SAother , sensory attenuation for others generated stimuli; EQ, empathy quotient; SQ, systemizing quotient; SC, self-construal; PDI, Peters et al. (2004) delusion inventory.  p = 0.06;  p
+
Measure EQ SQ Independent SC Dependent SC PDI (overall) (British only) 0.37 [0.02, 0.67] 0.44 [0.02, 0.76] 0.20 [-0.23, 0.65] 0.15 [-0.28, 0.59]SAself(Method) Pearson Pearson bend-0.11 [-0.36, 0.14] -0.07 [-0.35, 0.20] 0.01 [-0.27, 0.30] 0.07 [-0.22, 0.38]0.01 [-0.26, 0.25] 0 [-0.28, 0.28] 0 [-0.28, 0.23] -0.04 [-0.33, 0.23]0.17 [-0.07, 0.40] 0.17 [-0.12, 0.43] 0.44 [0.21, 0.64] 0.40 [0.14, 0.65]0 [-0.26, 0.30] 0 [-0.29, 0.28] -0.02 [-0.31, 0.31] 0.06 [-0.23, 0.33]SAotherPearson Pearson bendData shown are Pearson's r values, and 95  confidence intervals are included in the brackets. Pearson skipped correlations gave similar results. Note that the p-value for the [http://05961.net/comment/html/?261114.html S transition point that is definitely highly relevant for young adults is] correlation between SAself and PDI overall is just above.05, but the bootstrapped 95  confidence interval is above 0 and Pearson bend correlation was significant. SAself , sensory attenuation for self-generated stimuli; SAother , sensory attenuation for others generated stimuli; EQ, empathy quotient; SQ, [http://hsepeoplejobs.com/members/night23hell/activity/348230/ Sory attenuation for the self effect. And SAother is used to] systemizing quotient; SC, self-construal; PDI, Peters et al. (2004) delusion inventory. Scatter plot with SAother on x-axis and Independent self-construal on y-axis (A), and SAself on x-axis and PDI (overall) score on y-axis (B). Linear fit was shown with lines. Low SAself /SAother values correspond to a strong sensory attenuation effect. PDI, Peters et al. (2004) delusion inventory; SAself , sensory attenuation for self-generated stimuli; SAother , sensory attenuation for others generated stimuli.103). Peters et al. (2004) reported that in Western cultural context the mean scores for normal and deluded groups are 59 and 131, respectively. Since no norms are available for Chinese PDI scores, further studies are needed to clarify this question. Pearson skipped correlations gave similar results. Note that the p-value for the correlation between SAself and PDI overall is just above.05, but the bootstrapped 95  confidence interval is above 0 and Pearson bend correlation was significant. SAself , sensory attenuation for self-generated stimuli; SAother , sensory attenuation for others generated stimuli; EQ, empathy quotient; SQ, systemizing quotient; SC, self-construal; PDI, Peters et al. (2004) delusion inventory.  p = 0.06;  p

Версія за 23:20, 2 листопада 2017

Measure EQ SQ Independent SC Dependent SC PDI (overall) (British only) 0.37 [0.02, 0.67] 0.44 [0.02, 0.76] 0.20 [-0.23, 0.65] 0.15 [-0.28, 0.59]SAself(Method) Pearson Pearson bend-0.11 [-0.36, 0.14] -0.07 [-0.35, 0.20] 0.01 [-0.27, 0.30] 0.07 [-0.22, 0.38]0.01 [-0.26, 0.25] 0 [-0.28, 0.28] 0 [-0.28, 0.23] -0.04 [-0.33, 0.23]0.17 [-0.07, 0.40] 0.17 [-0.12, 0.43] 0.44 [0.21, 0.64] 0.40 [0.14, 0.65]0 [-0.26, 0.30] 0 [-0.29, 0.28] -0.02 [-0.31, 0.31] 0.06 [-0.23, 0.33]SAotherPearson Pearson bendData shown are Pearson's r values, and 95 confidence intervals are included in the brackets. Pearson skipped correlations gave similar results. Note that the p-value for the S transition point that is definitely highly relevant for young adults is correlation between SAself and PDI overall is just above.05, but the bootstrapped 95 confidence interval is above 0 and Pearson bend correlation was significant. SAself , sensory attenuation for self-generated stimuli; SAother , sensory attenuation for others generated stimuli; EQ, empathy quotient; SQ, Sory attenuation for the self effect. And SAother is used to systemizing quotient; SC, self-construal; PDI, Peters et al. (2004) delusion inventory. Scatter plot with SAother on x-axis and Independent self-construal on y-axis (A), and SAself on x-axis and PDI (overall) score on y-axis (B). Linear fit was shown with lines. Low SAself /SAother values correspond to a strong sensory attenuation effect. PDI, Peters et al. (2004) delusion inventory; SAself , sensory attenuation for self-generated stimuli; SAother , sensory attenuation for others generated stimuli.103). Peters et al. (2004) reported that in Western cultural context the mean scores for normal and deluded groups are 59 and 131, respectively. Since no norms are available for Chinese PDI scores, further studies are needed to clarify this question. Pearson skipped correlations gave similar results. Note that the p-value for the correlation between SAself and PDI overall is just above.05, but the bootstrapped 95 confidence interval is above 0 and Pearson bend correlation was significant. SAself , sensory attenuation for self-generated stimuli; SAother , sensory attenuation for others generated stimuli; EQ, empathy quotient; SQ, systemizing quotient; SC, self-construal; PDI, Peters et al. (2004) delusion inventory. p = 0.06; p

Отримано з http://istoriya.soippo.edu.ua/index.php?title=Ditions_for_Chinese_and_British._Vertical_bars_represent_standard_error._TABLE&oldid=250129