Ditions for Chinese and British. Vertical bars represent standard error. TABLE

For unknown reasons we failed to obtain a SGC707 chemical information significant sensory attenuation for the self effect, which has been previously shown (Sato, 2008; Weiss et al., 2011). Vertical bars represent standard error. TABLE 1 | Summary of correlation analysis between SAself /SAother and four questionnaires scores using Pearson'scorrelation and Pearson bend correlation. Measure EQ SQ Independent SC Dependent SC PDI (overall) (British only) 0.37 [0.02, 0.67] 0.44 [0.02, 0.76] 0.20 [-0.23, 0.65] 0.15 [-0.28, 0.59]SAself(Method) Pearson Pearson bend-0.11 [-0.36, 0.14] -0.07 [-0.35, 0.20] 0.01 [-0.27, 0.30] 0.07 [-0.22, 0.38]0.01 [-0.26, 0.25] 0 [-0.28, 0.28] 0 [-0.28, 0.23] -0.04 [-0.33, 0.23]0.17 [-0.07, 0.40] 0.17 [-0.12, 0.43] 0.44 [0.21, 0.64] 0.40 [0.14, 0.65]0 [-0.26, 0.30] 0 [-0.29, 0.28] -0.02 [-0.31, 0.31] 0.06 [-0.23, 0.33]SAotherPearson Pearson bendData shown are Pearson's r values, and 95 confidence intervals are included in the brackets. Pearson skipped correlations gave similar results. Note that the p-value for the correlation between SAself and PDI overall is just above.05, but the bootstrapped 95 confidence interval is above 0 and Pearson bend correlation was significant. SAself , sensory attenuation for self-generated stimuli; SAother , sensory attenuation for others generated stimuli; EQ, empathy quotient; SQ, systemizing quotient; SC, self-construal; PDI, Peters et al. (2004) delusion inventory. p = 0.06; p