3 Profitable Approaches For Natural Product Library Which Usually never Fails

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

However, a close examination of the RT distribution shows a clear bi-modal distribution ( Fig. 2), which appeared to primarily come from trials in which a potential target had occupied the location where the probe flashed (compare Fig. 4A and B). We hypothesized that the short RTs creating the mode around 100?ms came from trials in which the animal had planned a saccade to the potential target and, when the probe appeared in that location, was able to rapidly make a correct saccade to that location because the saccade had been pre-planned. Thus, it is possible that the shorter mean RT seen in the potential target condition compared to the visited T condition could be due to the fact that the potential target condition had more of these compound screening assay short-latency saccades because the monkeys planned and made more saccades to a potential target than to a visited T. If this were the case, then the means GDC-0973 nmr of the main distributions would be the same and it would suggest that there is no inhibitory tagging. To test this, we cut the RT data to remove the early mode and late tail (hollow columns; Fig. 4A and B) using times specific to each monkey based on the distribution in the potential target condition. For all three monkeys, ANOVAs performed on the cut distributions, which included all four conditions, were significant (p???0.001), with the strong significant differences between the RTs in the visited T and potential target conditions (p?Aldosterone hoc Tukey��s HSD tests; Fig. 4C�CE). It is also possible that the animals had planned multiple saccades to all or many of the potential target locations, which could mean that the difference in RTs between potential targets and visited Ts may be due to faster RTs to potential targets rather than slower RTs to visited Ts. To control for this, we compared the RTs in the visited T condition to the RTs in the distractor condition. The theory is that the animals know that distractors are never loaded with reward, so they should not pre-plan saccades to these objects. In two of the three monkeys (D and H), we found that RTs to a visited T were significantly slower than RTs to a distractor (p?