Al. BMJ Open 2016;6:e014022. doi:ten.1136/bmjopen-2016-Open AccessFigure 1 Paramedic Pathfinder tool

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

Following Riessman,24 an L-characterized phenotype of fewer, paler melanocytes in tfap2a-/- null interview subject guide was developed around the basis with the literature and refined by means of the iterative course of action of conducting two pilotOpen AccessTable two Overview of sections of interview topic guide relevant to this present report and interviewer Following a short introduction along with the participant getting asked about their background and part, they had been asked about their views of and experiences of managing seizures. ABCD, airway, breathing, circulation, disability; PHEW, prehospital warning score; PR, perirectal; UCC, urgent care centre; ED, emergency division.information collection method was finest suited to our aims since it provides a medium by which the world may be understood from a participant's point of view.22 Participants are able to raise what they regard as critical difficulties and issues, instead of the researcher imposing predetermined structures and assumptions.Noble AJ, et al. BMJ Open 2016;6:e014022. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2016-The interviews had been introduced to participants as wanting to explore paramedic's views concerning seizure management and what, if any, were their help requirements. Following Riessman,24 an interview subject guide was created on the basis in the literature and refined by means of the iterative process of conducting two pilotOpen AccessTable two Overview of sections of interview topic guide relevant to this present report and interviewer Following a short introduction as well as the participant getting asked about their background and role, they were asked about their views of and experiences of managing seizures. The primary themes relevant to this current report with examples of prompts are offered below: Theme Example queries Perceptions of challenges faced when managing seizure What would be the key challenges you perceive ambulance crews face in managing seizures? What factors influence care-decisions? Why? What sort of self-confidence do you/paramedics have in managing seizures? What accounts for this? What alternatives are offered when a person does not have to be conveyed to ED? What are your experiences and views of employing and accessing these? In what way are paramedics supported in their clinical decision-making by their organisation (eg, on-scene/after-scene support/protocols/guidance)? What are your experiences/views of these?Discharge alternatives for persons who didn't have to have ED Prospective strengths/weakness in relation to support offered to crewsED, emergency department.interviews (table 2).25 Locations covered incorporated: (1) an introductory phase; (2) participants perceptions from the challenges crews face when managing seizures; (three) availability of discharge options for persons who did not have to be conveyed to ED; (4) training and/or support supplied to crews from their organisation; (5) prospective strengths and weakness in relation for the assessment tools provided to paramedics by the service and (6) views in relation to further coaching needs on seizure management for paramedics. The use of the subject guide, primarily as a conversational agenda instead of a procedural directive,26 enabled the researcher to clarify uncertainties with follow-up questions and to use the responses offered by participants to continually inform the evolving conversation.23 27 FCS (PhD), a university-based qualitative researcher using a specialist interest in overall health services investigation but no specialist information of your ambulance service, conducted the interviews. Participants had been informed that participation was anonymous and told the study outcomes would be published. No non-participants were present throughout the interviews.