In mm): 0.20, 0.29, 0.18, 0.24, 0.27. Legs with all claws smooth, without ventral dentition or

Distinct solea present on ventral surface of tarsus I (Fig. 35A). Metatarsi I and II heavily ornamented on proximal half, with distal half smooth (Fig. 35A, B). Remaining metatarsi with complete ornamentation (Fig. 35C-F). Male tarsus IV completely divided into two tarsomeres (Fig. 35D, E). Adenostyle with robust claw, wide base, and compact pore at apex on lateral (external) side (Fig. 35D). Long title= genomeA.00431-14 seta rising from medial (internal) face of adenostyle from beneath pore to above apex (Fig. 35D, E); pretty quick seta increasing from adenostyle base under pore on lateral (external) face (Fig. 35D) (example with adenostyle title= IAS.17.4.19557 features labeled, Fig. five).New species of Austropurcellia, cryptic short-range endemic mite harvestmen...Figure 34. Austropurcellia nuda sp. n., males, QM berlesate 413. A chelicera B palp. Scale bar: 200 m (A); one hundred m (B).Katya R. Jay et al. / ZooKeys 586: 37?three (2016)Figure 35. Austropurcellia nuda sp. n., males and female. A male tarsus and metatarsus I, QM berlesate 413 B male tarsus and metatarsus title= journal.pone.0135129 II, QM berlesate 413 C male tarsus and metatarsus III, QM berlesate 413 D male tarsus and metatarsus IV, lateral view, QM berlesate 38118, paratype E male tarsus and metatarsus IV, medial view, QM berlesate 38118, paratype F female tarsus and metatarsus IV, QM berlesate 413. Scale bars: one hundred m.Measurements from male paratype of leg articles from proximal to distal (in mm): leg I 0.18, 0.52, 0.20, 0.39, 0.14, 0.41; leg II 0.15, 0.41, 0.19, 0.33, 0.14, 0.37; leg III [trochanter damaged], 0.37, 0.20, 0.29, 0.23, 0.32; leg IV 0.19, 0.44, 0.19, 0.35, 0.16, 0.39. Width measurements from male paratype of leg articles from proximal toNew species of Austropurcellia, cryptic short-range endemic mite harvestmen...distal (in mm): leg I 0.20, 0.16, 0.17, 0.16, 0.14, 0.20; leg II 0.18, 0.15, 0.15, 0.15, 0.12, 0.13; leg III [trochanter damaged], 0.17, 0.16, 0.19, 0.13, 0.14; leg IV 0.18, 0.19, 0.18, 0.18, 0.15, 0.17. Etymology. The distinct epithet is derived from the very first declension type of ndus, from Latin, which means "bare" or "naked", a reference to diagnostic absence in the scopula or ornamentation in the anal plate within this species. Austropurcellia riedeli Jay, Oberski Boyer, sp. n. http://zoobank.org/672A8F03-19C4-47CE-BD10-85156747B57F Figs 36?1 Material examined. Holotype. Male (QM 102448), Rossville, Bloomfield (sample 2B, AR2), 15.792 , 145.302 , coll. Alex Riedel 1.v.2014. Paratype. 1 female, Rossville, Bloomfield (sample 2B, AR2), 15.792 , 145.302 , coll. Alex Riedel 1.v.2014, QM 102449. Further material. 1 male, two females, Rossville, Bloomfield (sample 2, AR1), 15.792 , 145.302 , coll. Alex Riedel 29.iv.2014, MCZ IZ 69026, Macalester SEM stubs M30.13, M30.14, M30.15. Diagnosis. Distinguished from congeners by flat anal plate granulated anteriorly, with pretty brief and round scopula emerging from posterior third of plate. Lobes of tergites VIII and IX rounded and prominent in dorsal view; absence of granulation in junction of the anal plate, the lobes of tergite VIII, and the dorsal scutum. Length of male NVP-BGT226 web Holotype (Fig.