Little Ones, Hard Work Or Baf-A1

1% plaque and 4.2% of the implants with signs of inflammation at the 5-year control. Discussion: Implants used in this study had high survival and success rates after 5 years. Marginal bone was well maintained, irrespective of the loading regime. To cite this article: Mertens C, Steveling HG. Early and immediate loading of titanium implants with fluoride-modified surfaces: results of 5-year prospective study. Clin. Oral Impl. Res. xx, 2011; 000�C000. ""Aim: To compare the 10-year marginal bone loss rates around implants supporting single-unit crowns in tobacco smokers with and without a history of treated periodontitis. Materials and methods: In this retrospective controlled study, 40 tobacco smokers were divided into four groups of 10 patients Baf-A1 in vivo each. Two groups of periodontally compromised (PC) patients and two groups of periodontally healthy (PH) patients were established. PC patients had been treated for their periodontal conditions before implant placement. All patients were enrolled in a regular, individually tailored maintenance care program. For the rehabilitation of PC and PH patients, two different types of implants were used (Nobel Biocare AB; Straumann? Dental Implant System). The radiographic bone loss rate was calculated by subtracting the bone levels at the time of crown delivery from the bone levels at the 10-year follow-up. Results: The mean age, mean full-mouth plaque score and full-mouth bleeding score and implant location were similar for the four groups. Implant survival rates ranged between 70% and 100%, without statistically significant differences between Lumacaftor Resminostat the four groups (P>0.05). Implants placed in PC patients yielded statistically significantly higher marginal bone loss rates compared with those in PH patients (P