Media Planning Vs Media Buying: Which can be More vital?

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

A media planner is like a writer who creates the screen play for any film. A media buyer is similar to the actor who brings the film your. A politician with a decent message who does not move out the vote loses the election. As well as a good media idea, poorly executed, may as well have already been an awful idea. Sometimes execution is everything.


A media plan could be brilliant, but will you choose executed with equal zeal? Will the master plan be executed on budget with the proper media vehicles, in the right place, on the correct time sufficient reason for maximum communications impact? Or even, the plan may not look so brilliant anymore. Media planning, media buying, and media selling are equal communications partners in driving ROI. Exactly why is Buying Underestimated? Since each of the disciplines (planning, buying, selling) are all of roughly equal in importance, I have always wondered why media textbooks dedicate just one or two pages to the art and science of media buying with no pages to media selling. Clients probably put the highest importance around the cost effectiveness in the buys negotiated on their behalf. Agencies can lose clients judging by poor media buying performance, bu I can't think I'm able to ever remember a company losing a merchant account due to a media simulation model. Perhaps some academics think that cable is a lot more conceptual, more creative, more research oriented, and provides better mettle for that mind. These assumptions aren't necessarily so. Media buying at its best requires honed negotiation skills that may be considered a course in psychology. Buying and yes it requires a comprehension from the communications method that rivals media planning. And media buyers require a expertise in the research documenting how different media variables, including commercial affect performance and advertising effectiveness. It is ironic that a lot of clients possess the opposite belief where buying is a lot more important than planning. In the end, that is certainly in which the rubber hits the path along with the money is spent. Today, media buyers won't you need to be in charge of buying TRPS or clicks at the deepest possible price, but must discover ways to "buy communication, not TRPS, as outlined by most professionals. Beyond CPM, just how can a buy's communications effectiveness be maximized? Program involvement, attention levels, contextual considerations, commercial positioning as well as a host of variables use a greater influence on communications effectiveness than media weight and CPMs. TRPS are certainly not TRPS.