My Brand New NU7441 Application Work Even If You Fall Asleep!

Error bars represent ... In our statistical analyses of the listeners' responses to deviants, check details we conducted three planned comparisons separately for each listener group using simultaneous tests for general linear hypotheses with the multcomp package in R (Hothorn et al., 2008). P-values were adjusted using the single-step method. We compared each groups' response to the pooled standard (i.e., responses to the stimuli [idi], [i?i], and [i?i] when they are presented as standards in a block) to the groups' responses to the summary deviant response for each of the three contrasts. As expected for the English listeners, the response to the control contrast [i?i]-[i?i] was larger than the response to the standard stimuli (�� = 21.21, SE = 8.18, z = 2.59, p Oxygenase z = 1.20, p = 0.51). For the critical learner group, the MMN results followed the pattern predicted according to the hypothesis that learners successfully implemented the phonological knowledge of their second language at an early, pre-attentive stage of processing. A significant difference was observed between the standards and L1 allophonic contrast [idi]-[i?i] (�� = 20.31, SE = 8.19, z = 2.48, p BKM120 and the control contrast [i?i]-[i?i] (�� = 31.24, SE = 8.19, z = 3.82, p