Some Cozy Great Tips On AG-014699

Матеріал з HistoryPedia
Перейти до: навігація, пошук

Figure 2 Correlation of the percentages of DNA populations in rAAV preparations obtained by next-generation sequencing (NGS) and inferred from quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR) data. The data obtained for the three references (rAAV genome, backbone ... The qPCR data indicated the presence of a higher proportion of buy LDK378 the rAAV genome than found using SSV-Seq (average +2.1%), mirrored by a smaller number of DNA contaminants (Table 1). All of the qPCR spanning the rAAV genome yielded very similar results, except for the widely used ��universal�� ITR2 qPCR, which led to higher values, as usually observed in our laboratory (Supplementary Table S1). This observation is likely partially responsible for an over-estimation of the rAAV genome in our qPCR data. However, despite these limited variations, we obtained a significant correlation with the NGS results (Spearman's correlation coefficient = 0.9938, P Quetiapine features of rAAV preparations. Thus, we further analyzed the origin of reads spanning the human genome. The normalized densities of reads per AG14699 chromosome suggested an overall random distribution for the rAAV samples, within a twofold range (Figure 3a). Interestingly, we found two over-represented loci: (i) mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) in rAAV preparations purified by CsCl; and (ii) specific DNA sequences from chromosome 15 in particles purified by AVB. Figure 3 Distribution of DNA contaminants from human chromosomes. (a) Density of reads mapped per chromosome and mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) obtained after normalization to the read count of the internal normalizer, which contained sonicated DNA extracted from HEK-293 ... The sequences of the mtDNA found in the rAAV preparations purified by CsCl were highly specific for the D-loop, which is a triple-stranded DNA region found in the major noncoding region of mtDNA22 (Figure 3b) that is insensitive to DNase I.23 The D-loop contamination was reduced by our optimized DNase cocktail treatment, indicating that mtDNA was somehow copurified along with the rAAV particles during CsCl purification but was probably not encapsidated. Without DNase treatment, the D-loop represented approximately 1.3% of the reads mapped to the human genome but only 0.0015% of all mapped reads (Supplementary Table S6). This low level of contamination in the CsCl-purified preparations was confirmed by D-loop-specific qPCR, as indicated on the right side of Figure 3b.