Ted. In addition, Blandy's mezzotint was created not simply within the

Wellcome Library, London.had endured as a consequence of rumors and get PRIMA-1 published reports. ``Miss Mary Blandy, 1751. Engraving. Supply. #Look and Learn/Peter Jackson Collection/Bridgeman Photos.lettering underneath informs us that Mary is her cell in Oxford Castle.104 Here she is once again in Figure three, hunting ever so pretty within a good frock in a pastoral scene. The contradiction is inside the detail. The text informs us that the image is ``Taken from life in Oxford Castle, and once again her gown will not cover her shackles. Both the presence of a maid plus the ignominy of becoming fettered had been matters Mary Blandy raised in her own defense through her trial and were central to several pamphlets discussing her case.105 The inscription reads ``Miss Molly Blandy who with her personal and her sweetheart's contrivance did barbarously and title= journal.pone.0075009 inhumanly poison her own father for his estate. And-- just in case the observer has not kept up with present affairs--there is an accompanying moral in verse. But the verse underneath supplies an unexpected motive: it will not mention Cranstoun or marriage, rather recalling essentially the most prevalent parricide narrative from the coldhearted kid killing their parent for cash, ``How could a hand so soft and fair commit ``a crime so black and horrid? The answer, ```Twas gold, with which mankind is curs'd, / `twas gold that was her raging thirst/Her father's wealth and that alone/it was that turn'd her heart to stone. The verse ends by warning other youngsters to take heed of her ``sad catastrophe. The catastrophe itself was depicted visually elsewhere, as in Figure 4, where the main image shows Mary hunting whimsical and quite, with her gallows scene underneath. As any eighteenth-century person knew, hanging was not a glamorous death. It is ironic that the title= j.1369-6513.1999.00027.x proof that enables us to analyze Mary Blandy's trial and reactions to it so totally is the fact that of which she most complained. At her trial, Mary spoke out against the ``hardships sheJournal of Loved ones History 41(three)Figure 3. ``Miss Molly Blandy, printed for B. Dickinson, February 3, 1752. Etching. Wellcome Library, London.had endured as a consequence of rumors and published reports. She especially resented the publication of ``papers and depositions, which ought to not have already been published, to be able to represent me because the most abandoned of my sex, and to prejudice the globe against me.106 Solicitor Basic, Bathurst, acknowledged her feelings of violation at such media intrusion. He title= 890334415573001 confirmed that ``the printing what was given in evidence ahead of the Coroner, drawing odious comparisons involving her and former parricides, and spreading scandalous reports in regard to her manner of demeaning herself in prison, was a shameful behaviour towards her, and also a gross offence against public justice. The judge, summing up the case, stated a lot exactly the same.107 But these matters were immaterial. The jury were instructed to ``disregard what you have heard out of this spot. The matter that they were to establish was whether when Mary gave the poison to her father she knew it to become poison and the effect it would have.